Teams

Traxler

2023 Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-10-05vs The Vicious VolliesLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Deitrick / Jennifer Sheridan vs Avraham Amram / Denise Freeman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-20vs NewcomerWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Guo / Mesanie Lee vs Susan Maier / Greg Leihy6-1, 6-4
2023-09-12vs The Vicious VolliesLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Deitrick / Jeannie Park vs Avraham Amram / Shelena Sanderson4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJack Lavinder / Janet Miller vs John Matthews / Janette O Logan3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMark Guo / Jennifer Sheridan vs Wayne Powell / Angela Parker0-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-09-10vs NewcomerLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanet Miller / David Deitrick vs Tim Mowry / Marla LaHaye6-7, 4-6
2023-09-07vs NewcomerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJack Lavinder / Janet Miller vs Cindy Mexcur / Jeff Johnson5-7, 1-6
2023-08-31vs NewcomerLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Sheridan / Mark Guo vs Stephanie Zorn / Richard Albers7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-08-27vs The Vicious VolliesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJack Lavinder / Ellen McLaughlin vs John Matthews / Denise Freeman6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDavid Deitrick / Jennifer Sheridan vs Kevin Woodruff / Mia Piansay5-7, 1-6
2023-08-20vs NewcomerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Deitrick / Janet Miller vs Tom Lusby / Marla Lusby6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMesanie Lee / Mark Guo vs Amy Tacka / Tim Mowry7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2023-08-17vs The Vicious VolliesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJack Lavinder / Jeannie Park vs Avraham Amram / Shelena Sanderson1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 55 & Over 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Clayton Coker
published 4
3.79
David Deitrick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.76
Jack Lavinder
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Ellen McLaughlin
published
3.52
Mark Guo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Greg Koch
published
3.23
Daniel Mandl
published 3.5
3.17
Mesanie Lee
published
Jeannie Park
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Clayton Coker
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
David Deitrick
24W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Jack Lavinder
97W–102L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Ellen McLaughlin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Mark Guo
68W–128L career · 4 lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
3.52
Greg Koch
18W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Daniel Mandl
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Mesanie Lee
24W–26L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jeannie Park
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.