Teams

Little Bit of Pressure

2026 USTA ADULT 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

12 players · average NTRP 4.28 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-05-06vs Idaho/Newby/40&Over4.5WLost 01
L#1 SinglesHanna Bigelow vs Lisa Sliger3-6, 0-6
2026-04-27vs Idaho/Newby/40&Over4.5WLost 01
L#1 SinglesHanna Bigelow vs Lisa Sliger1-6, 0-6
2026-04-24vs Idaho/Newby/40&Over4.5WLost 01
L#1 SinglesHanna Bigelow vs Suzie Sabala0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Newby/40&Over4.5W802938167
2PTSA 4.53482043291
3Little Bit of Pressure0772143288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Shelley Ware
published 4.5
4.12
Joelle Staley
published 4.5
4.01
Dana Gross
published 4.5
3.96
Vicki McBride
published
3.95
Carmen Little
published 4.5
3.95
Dana Rosellini
published 4.5
3.94
3.88
Ashley Tribble
published 4
3.85
Karen East
published 4
3.73
Andrea Lambe
published 4
Hanna Bigelow
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lisa Andrews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joelle Staley + Dana Rosellini81246% games−0.3% vs expected
Dana Rosellini + Shelley Ware3745% games−0.8% vs expected
Vicki McBride + Shelley Ware7857% games−1.1% vs expected
Dana Rosellini + Dana Gross282652% games−1.4% vs expected
Joelle Staley + Dana Gross5357% games−6.3% vs expected
Carmen Little + Shelley Ware6457% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Little + Hanna Bigelow2436% gamesnot enough data
Carmen Little + Vicki McBride314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Shelley Ware
144W–92L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
4.5
Joelle Staley
65W–70L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Dana Gross
73W–68L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
Vicki McBride
154W–127L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
4.5
Carmen Little
70W–64L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.95
4.5
Dana Rosellini
134W–115L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Anne Marie Carlisle
51W–41L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Ashley Tribble
182W–147L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Karen East
143W–86L career · no lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Andrea Lambe
43W–38L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Hanna Bigelow
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Andrews
40W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.