Teams

Virden/LR/Rebs

2026 Adult 40 & Over Spring 3 League · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-13vs Hogate/PVCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Osam / Anne Virden vs Julie Miller / Stephanie Pace2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Mamula vs Annie Hogate4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMary Claire McLaurin / Kelli Rawn vs Heidi Brandt / Emily Barnes6-0, 6-0
2026-05-12vs Cole/LR/OCWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Claire McLaurin / Kelli Rawn vs Melissa Johnston / Angelia Mckenney6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMegan Osam vs Angie Stout6-4, 7-5
2026-05-11vs Cole/LR/OCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Virden / Amanda Mamula vs Kim Cole / Heather Smith6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMegan Osam vs Angie Stout6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Claire McLaurin / Kelli Rawn vs Melissa Johnston / Peyton Mills6-3, 6-3
2026-04-09vs Hogate/PVCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Claire McLaurin / Kelli Rawn vs Annie Hogate / Nikki Feucht6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLaurie Criddle vs Christa Kuebel1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Virden / Megan Osam vs Christy Moss / Jennifer Bobbitt1-6, 2-6
2026-03-12vs Hogate/PVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaurie Criddle / Megan Osam vs Emily Barnes / Christy Moss6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesKelli Rawn vs Julie Miller6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmanda Mamula / Anne Virden vs Christa Kuebel / Jennifer Bulmanski5-7, 6-7
2026-03-05vs Cole/LR/OCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAmanda Mamula / Anne Virden vs Christie Crolley / Angelia Mckenney7-6, 7-5
W#1 SinglesKelli Rawn vs Melissa Johnston6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMegan Osam / Laurie Criddle vs Kristi Shirley / Shirley Nelson6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hogate/PVCC5112615140
2Virden/LR/Rebs4212612131
3Cole/LR/OC0621632201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.40 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.72
Kelli Rawn
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #4 Doubles 27% · published
2.62
Megan Osam
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Amanda Mamula
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.43
Mary Claire McLaurin
usually #2 Doubles 30%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published
2.22
Laurie Criddle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.96
Anne Virden
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Claire McLaurin + Kelli Rawn12366% games+13.5% vs expected
Anne Virden + Amanda Mamula213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelli Rawn
33W–14L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
Megan Osam
7W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%20%80%
2.62
2.5
Amanda Mamula
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
Mary Claire McLaurin
20W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Laurie Criddle
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Anne Virden
2W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.