Teams

Ra.Rav18S

2026 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-30vs De.Farmer18S2.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesJeff Jugan vs Brian Graham3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesRajiv Raj vs Karthik Tottempudi2-6, 2-6
2026-07-27vs De.Farmer18S2.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesMichael Cassibry vs Aldani Herrera6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesDan Sevieri vs Jose Sanchez1-6, 3-6
2026-07-13vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesHogan Ellis vs Aldani Herrera6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichael Cassibry vs Jason Nance6-4, 6-1
L#3 SinglesLen Swanson vs Karthik Tottempudi5-7, 2-6
2026-07-07vs De.Farmer18S2.5Lost 02
L#1 SinglesLen Swanson vs Isaias Barajas6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesShaoyu Chen vs Jason Nance0-6, 0-6
2026-06-22vs De.Farmer18S2.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesJeff Jugan vs Aldani Herrera6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMichael Cassibry vs Isaias Barajas6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLen Swanson vs varun nalam4-6, 5-7
2026-06-15vs De.Farmer18S2.5Lost 12
W#1 SinglesJeff Jugan vs Jason Nance6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesRajiv Raj vs Aldani Herrera7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesDan Sevieri vs varun nalam0-6, 1-6
2026-06-08Split 11
W#1 SinglesHogan Ellis vs Brian Graham6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesShaoyu Chen vs Jose Sanchez0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 2.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ra.Rav18S2571430211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Hogan Ellis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.55
Michael Cassibry
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.44
Jeff Jugan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.40
Len Swanson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.29
Rajiv Raj
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Dan Sevieri
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Shaoyu Chen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Hogan Ellis
8W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.73
Michael Cassibry
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.55
Jeff Jugan
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.44
Len Swanson
3W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.40
Rajiv Raj
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Dan Sevieri
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Shaoyu Chen
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.