Teams

Team 14 This is 40-love

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-15vs Team 2 Hot SeatsLost 02
L#1 DoublesEve Pandit / Judy OConnor vs Mary Berkowitz / Andrea Gevas3-6, 6-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Kahn / Anastasia Smith vs Elizabeth Law / Stephanie Glashow2-6, 3-6
2023-07-10vs Team 7Lost 01
L#1 DoublesFllory Correa / Eve Pandit vs Colleen Peacher / Alison Ouchna3-6, 4-4
2023-07-08vs Team 12 Volley LlamasLost 01
L#2 DoublesEve Pandit / Kristin Kahn vs Jennifer Gatewood / Denise Weinig4-6, 4-4
2023-06-30vs Team 11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKristin Kahn / Ashley Vroman-Lee vs KC Nguyen / Brooke Daniels1-6, 2-6
2023-06-24vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#2 DoublesFllory Correa / Judy OConnor vs Genea Kennedy / Melinda Capitano4-6, 5-5
2023-06-18vs Team 3 Springfield Summer AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEve Pandit / Judy OConnor vs Victoria Rader / Page Coleman4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesGrace Kim / Kristin Kahn vs Michele Brookhart / Jodi Constantino6-2, 6-4
2023-06-10vs Team 8 MatchPointSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Kahn / Judy OConnor vs Jeri Borsi / Blanca Shumann6-7, 0-3
W#2 DoublesTiffany Malloy / Eve Pandit vs Beth Hill / Lauren Rowley6-2, 6-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Eve Pandit
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Judy OConnor
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Grace Kim
published 3.5
3.13
Tiffany Malloy
published
3.04
Kristin Kahn
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Fllory Correa
published 3
Susan Wade
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy OConnor + Eve Pandit13463% games+5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Eve Pandit
136W–75L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Judy OConnor
73W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Grace Kim
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tiffany Malloy
8W–10L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kristin Kahn
128W–147L career · type A · 8 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Fllory Correa
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Wade
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.