Teams

Harpers

2025 OH OV SUMMER Career A40&O Cincinnati · 2025 Summer Career A40&O 4.0W Cincinnati

13 players · average NTRP 4.17 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-06-10vs Queen City GoldSplit 22
L#1 DoublesKaren Buddemeyer / Susan Santos vs Lizzy Peckskamp-Wayne / Tricia Headley4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLaurie Trippet vs Connie Allen6-4, 3-6, 3-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Baldwin / Cynthia Flores-Rae vs Jana Monzel / Kathleen Adams6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesStacy Williams / Mandy Longbottom vs Jennifer Kendall-Smith / Karen Worley4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Summer Career A40&O 4.0W Cincinnati have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Deia Sutton
published 4.5
3.81
Susan Santos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Karen Buddemeyer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Colleen Leonard
published 4
Cynthia Flores-Rae
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Laurie Trippet
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.69
Melissa Snyder
published
3.47
Mandy Longbottom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Baldwin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kathy Guerin
published
STANCA SCHILFF
published
Sarah Kirlin
published
Susan Arthur
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Santos + Deia Sutton7165% games+13.2% vs expected
Karen Buddemeyer + Susan Santos224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Baldwin + Laurie Trippet134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Baldwin + Kathy Guerin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Deia Sutton
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Santos
30W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Karen Buddemeyer
23W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Colleen Leonard
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Cynthia Flores-Rae
193W–97L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laurie Trippet
11W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Melissa Snyder
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Mandy Longbottom
7W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Julie Baldwin
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Guerin
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
STANCA SCHILFF
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Kirlin
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Arthur
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.