Teams

Crawford/18/2.5/WD/W3

2026 Lake Charles Adult 18 & Over - Women · 2.5 LC (18&O) Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-03vs Bordelon/18/2.5/WD/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Liggio / Alicia Claudio vs Haley Bordelon / Jo Waite0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLillian Lundy vs Marcela Jones2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMahala Ebarb / Aimee Hankin vs Liz McCutchen / Katie Benoit2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-04-29vs Tyler/18/2.5/WD/W3Lost 12
W#1 DoublesSamantha Orduno / Nikki Crooks vs Kimberly Vasquez / Alexandra Maier6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMahala Ebarb vs Tabitha Tyler0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Claudio / Lillian Lundy vs Allison Schnake / Jacqueline Richard2-6, 1-6
2026-04-19vs Osbourn/18/2.5/WD/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMahala Ebarb / Lillian Lundy vs Laurie Callaba / Tabitha Morrow1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSamantha Orduno vs Catherine Osbourn1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Ritchie / Alicia Claudio vs Dawn Redd / June Green0-6, 0-6
2026-04-02vs Brown/18/2.5/WD/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnna Liggio / Nikki Crooks vs Gina Macdonald / Sherry Pfantz3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAlicia Claudio vs Christine Walker3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Orduno / Mahala Ebarb vs Gail Neely / Candice Skinner1-6, 1-6
2026-02-22vs Hoffpauir/18/2.5/WD/W3Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAimee Hankin / Heather Ritchie vs Krissy Morris / Sylvia Downing3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLillian Lundy vs Elyse Stanley6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSamantha Orduno / Anna Liggio vs Jessica Hayes / Mila Robichaux2-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 LC (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.25
Samantha Orduno
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.11
Aimee Hankin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.07
Anna Liggio
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.05
Alicia Claudio
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
1.96
Lillian Lundy
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.95
Mahala Ebarb
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Heather Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nikki Crooks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Samantha Orduno
8W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Aimee Hankin
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Anna Liggio
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.07
2.5
Alicia Claudio
0W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Lillian Lundy
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
Mahala Ebarb
0W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Heather Ritchie
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nikki Crooks
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.