Teams

Healy/Arkadelphia

2025 Adult 65 & Over · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-28vs LaGrossa/GreenbrierWon 21
W#1 DoublesDee Healy / Carol Ketchum vs Deborah Benson / Debbie Cooper7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Banister / Rhea Ruggles vs Carey Freeman / Jan Tipton4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCarol Jones / Kara Ford vs Maria Rocha / Camille LaGrossa6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2025-09-27vs Jeter/NWALost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Ketchum / Rhea Ruggles vs Susan Akins / Brenda Jeter6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKara Ford / Carol Jones vs Margie Moss / Nan Ginger6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Banister / Rebecca Reed vs Mary Leigh Burnette / Vickie Huckaby2-6, 0-6
2025-09-26vs Jeter/NWALost 03
L#1 DoublesLonna Hansen / Kara Ford vs Mary Leigh Burnette / Vickie Huckaby2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Reed / Carol Jones vs Susan Akins / Brenda Jeter4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Ketchum / Rhea Ruggles vs Cathy Faber / Margie Moss6-7, 2-6
2025-09-26vs LaGrossa/GreenbrierLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Jones / Lonna Hansen vs Debbie Cooper / Deborah Benson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRhea Ruggles / Carol Ketchum vs Trudy Pascale / Sheffield Duke6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Banister / Rebecca Reed vs Maria Rocha / Sip Mouden0-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Carol Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.57
Suzanne Banister
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Dee Healy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Carol Ketchum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.35
Rebecca Reed
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Kara Ford
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Sara Barnett
published
Lonna Hansen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rhea Ruggles
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carol Ketchum + Dee Healy10656% games−4.4% vs expected
Carol Ketchum + Rhea Ruggles123 matchesnot enough data
Carol Jones + Rebecca Reed033 matchesnot enough data
Suzanne Banister + Rebecca Reed033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carol Jones
15W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.65
Suzanne Banister
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
3.5
Dee Healy
17W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Carol Ketchum
14W–9L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
Rebecca Reed
8W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Kara Ford
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Sara Barnett
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
Lonna Hansen
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rhea Ruggles
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.