Teams

Julington Creek - Berman

2025 Duval Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-12vs Timuquana - BulginLost 23
L#1 DoublesMegan Hendricks / Heather Storey vs Tracy Knight / Isabelle Milne3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnna Neal vs Julie Howard6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGina Betbeze / Stephane Derienzis vs Maggie Williams / Dawn Crawford1-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMichelle Karolak vs Kristin Bulgin6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLeslie de Jong / Valerie Markham vs Margaret Gulliford / KATHERINE FORRESTER6-4, 6-3
2025-06-21vs Duval/Gibson/18&Over3.5WLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Berman / Heather Storey vs Robin Corley / Leslie McClure3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesVanessa Viera / Gale Joy vs Stacy Rendzio / Lorrayne Carless4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMegan Hendricks vs Mary Anne Orenchuk1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLeslie de Jong / Angie Lively vs Kim McCall / Rhonda Gummerman6-1, 6-2
2025-06-14vs Marsh Landing - MauraSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKaren Berman / Megan Hendricks vs Shannon Maura / Ann Casey6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSandra Boney vs Shawn Cox5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGina Betbeze / Michelle Colon vs Tiffany Brassfield / Debbie Theiler6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMichelle Karolak vs Meredith Kowalczyk6-3, 6-4
2025-06-07vs FYC - KaneLost 01
L#2 DoublesHeather Storey / Frances Sanfiorenzo vs Ginger Vanderheyden / Elizabeth Smith2-6, 4-6
2025-05-31Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAngie Lively / Frances Sanfiorenzo vs Kim Price / Laurie Scott5-7, 0-6
2025-05-28vs Oakleaf - JohnsonLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaren Berman / Vanessa Viera vs Jen Bates / Danielle Euwema4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValerie Markham / Tina Markowitz vs Kendall Taylor / Ann Tiefenthaler7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSandra Boney vs Ann Poindexter2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Michelle Karolak vs Karen Meyer / Ronda Allen6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Anna Neal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Angie Lively
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Vanessa Viera
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Gina Betbeze
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Tina Markowitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Heather Storey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Megan Hendricks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.16
Karen Berman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Mary Helen Goodwin
published
3.10
Caroline Becker
published 3.5
3.03
Valerie Markham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.03
Gale Joy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Michelle Karolak
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Teresa Hulshult
published
2.98
Sandra Boney
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Frances Sanfiorenzo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leslie de Jong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Colon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stephane Derienzis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Storey + Megan Hendricks2350% games+2.2% vs expected
Karen Berman + Vanessa Viera2342% games−8.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Neal
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
3.5
Angie Lively
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Vanessa Viera
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Gina Betbeze
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Tina Markowitz
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Heather Storey
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Megan Hendricks
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Karen Berman
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
Mary Helen Goodwin
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Caroline Becker
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Valerie Markham
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.03
Gale Joy
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Michelle Karolak
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.03
Teresa Hulshult
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.03
Sandra Boney
2W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Frances Sanfiorenzo
45W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Leslie de Jong
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Colon
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stephane Derienzis
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.