Teams

EXTREME

2022 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-11vs 40-Love LadiesLost 01
L#1 DoublesRaluca Hera / Gabi Ifrim vs Jill LaRosa / Teresa Cueto1-6, 0-6
2022-08-06vs RalphWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicoleta Cristache / Raluca Hera vs Jenny Ott / Viktoria Ralph7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-02vs SAW (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Cretu / Nicoleta Cristache vs Amy Friedman / Heather Liati4-6, 3-6
2022-08-01vs Reudink-HollandLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Cretu / Nicoleta Cristache vs Mikhaila Reudink / Anne Holland1-6, 3-6
2022-07-30vs Over ServedLost 01
L#1 DoublesMonica Cretu / Mihaela Armanasu vs Tiffany Vuong / Leah Carroll1-6, 0-6
2022-06-13vs SummerFunTennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesMihaela Armanasu / Gabi Ifrim vs Alina Stanciu / Smaranda Lieuallen2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Gabi Ifrim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Monica Cretu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Nicoleta Cristache
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Raluca Hera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Alina Bibireata
published 2.5
Mihaela Armanasu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alina Bibireata + Monica Cretu7549% games+1.3% vs expected
Alina Bibireata + Raluca Hera4250% games−2.5% vs expected
Mihaela Armanasu + Gabi Ifrim044 matchesnot enough data
Monica Cretu + Gabi Ifrim224 matchesnot enough data
Gabi Ifrim + Nicoleta Cristache224 matchesnot enough data
Alina Bibireata + Mihaela Armanasu033 matchesnot enough data
Raluca Hera + Gabi Ifrim123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gabi Ifrim
51W–95L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Monica Cretu
61W–95L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Nicoleta Cristache
65W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Raluca Hera
28W–73L career · 2 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Alina Bibireata
41W–101L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mihaela Armanasu
9W–35L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.