Teams

High Point/Van Ausdall-Marroquin W4.0S

2023 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

20 players · average NTRP 3.92 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Makiko Bass
published
3.99
Laura Marroquin
published
3.76
Micki Harris
published
Amber Housley
published 4
Beena Paracha
published 4
Cindy Taylor
published 4
3.74
Valerie van Ausdall
published
3.68
Chris Sonnen
published 4
3.68
Linsey Ethington
published
3.66
Sandy Seaton
published
3.62
Yan Weber
published
3.59
Shannon Craig
published
3.54
Melissa Sipes
published
3.50
Christina Wellham
published 3.5
3.49
Doreen Thomas
published 4
3.48
Joulia Prous
published
3.37
Suzanne Kim
published
JUNKO CARRINGTON
published
Kally Tejada
published
Tonya Grubb
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie van Ausdall + Laura Marroquin4364% games+6.7% vs expected
Doreen Thomas + Amber Housley4248% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Seaton + Doreen Thomas1440% gamesnot enough data
Valerie van Ausdall + Doreen Thomas1447% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Seaton + Melissa Sipes134 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Craig + Suzanne Kim134 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Sipes + Doreen Thomas213 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Craig + Doreen Thomas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Makiko Bass
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
Laura Marroquin
36W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
3.99
Micki Harris
31W–21L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Amber Housley
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Beena Paracha
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cindy Taylor
11W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Valerie van Ausdall
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Chris Sonnen
23W–25L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Linsey Ethington
17W–21L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Sandy Seaton
17W–36L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Yan Weber
7W–18L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.62
Shannon Craig
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.59
Melissa Sipes
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Christina Wellham
36W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
4
Doreen Thomas
16W–29L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
3.49
Joulia Prous
7W–13L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
Suzanne Kim
11W–17L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.37
JUNKO CARRINGTON
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kally Tejada
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tonya Grubb
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.