Teams

Maccagli/Knoxville

2024 Tri-Level 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 2.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-02-10vs McElrathMonarch/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesLinda Roback / Yoko Umezawa vs Heather McKeehan / Suzanne Carswell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandy Garrard / Tara Osborne-Martz vs Monica Sarrat / Michelle Russ6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Shuman / Keri Brill vs Amy McCleary / Julia Beets6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-02-04vs Henderson/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesLinda Roback / Laura Warrick vs Lauren Hall / Leigh Henderson1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Bui / Jen Rose vs Erika Morris / Kayla O'Connor6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKeri Brill / Deanne Michaelson vs Carly OConnor / Meredith Holtz7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-27vs GomesBarton/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#2 DoublesSandy Garrard / Kathleen Sinclair vs Emily Mcclenagan / Laura Brumit0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFaith Chesney / Catherine Shuman vs Sarah Michalik / Sarah Scott7-5, 1-6, 0-1
2024-01-13vs Open/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#2 DoublesJen Rose / Kathleen Sinclair vs Ruthie Ivy / Tugba Turnaoglu6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesFaith Chesney / Amanda Niethammer vs Jennifer Mendoza / Misty Gouge6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Jessie Ostrowski
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.29
Laura Warrick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Linda Roback
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Tracey Belmont
published
3.15
Yoko Umezawa
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.11
Michelle Uhlenhake
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Jenne MacCagli
published
3.00
Tara Osborne-Martz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Amanda Niethammer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Sandy Garrard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Linda Bui
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Catherine Shuman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Faith Chesney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Maria Willard
published
2.64
Jen Rose
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Keri Brill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Deanne Michaelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Kathleen Sinclair
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Warrick + Kathleen Sinclair5160% games+12.4% vs expected
Laura Warrick + Tracey Belmont2354% games+8.3% vs expected
Laura Warrick + Jessie Ostrowski6453% games+6.9% vs expected
Jenne MacCagli + Michelle Uhlenhake81640% games+3.3% vs expected
Linda Bui + Sandy Garrard3545% games+1.4% vs expected
Jenne MacCagli + Linda Bui3547% games−0.6% vs expected
Laura Warrick + Linda Roback171250% games−2.2% vs expected
Tracey Belmont + Linda Roback3350% games−9.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessie Ostrowski
15W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.29
Laura Warrick
55W–50L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.29
Linda Roback
26W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Tracey Belmont
22W–30L career · no lines in 2024
10%90%1%
3.17
Yoko Umezawa
15W–60L career · 5 lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.15
Michelle Uhlenhake
28W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jenne MacCagli
18W–34L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Tara Osborne-Martz
24W–24L career · 1 line in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
3
Amanda Niethammer
37W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
Sandy Garrard
30W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
2.86
Linda Bui
32W–44L career · 1 line in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Catherine Shuman
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Faith Chesney
18W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Willard
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
Jen Rose
50W–36L career · 2 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
Keri Brill
16W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Deanne Michaelson
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Kathleen Sinclair
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.