Teams

Griffin/40/3.5/NC

2025 Man · Cov Mixed 40 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Alecia Seastrunk
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.29
Ryan Wadenpfuhl
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
3.27
Aaron Sinclair
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 26% · published 3.5
3.04
Chantel Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3
2.93
David LeBreton
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.79
Abby Morse
usually #3 Doubles 34%, also #2 Doubles 34% · published 3
Christopher Hess
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Ellen Sweetman
usually #2 Doubles 55%, also #3 Doubles 35% · published
Jennifer Sillars
usually #3 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Tracey
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Mignon Hess
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #1 Doubles 23% · published
Sheryl Scobel
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Warren Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Abby Morse + Karen Tracey4747% gamesnot enough data
Ryan Wadenpfuhl + Karen Tracey3642% gamesnot enough data
Karen Tracey + Chantel Freeman5448% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Sillars + Warren Griffin3450% gamesnot enough data
Abby Morse + Warren Griffin3343% gamesnot enough data
Abby Morse + Chantel Freeman3253% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Sillars + Karen Tracey033 matchesnot enough data
Ryan Wadenpfuhl + Warren Griffin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alecia Seastrunk
14W–12L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Ryan Wadenpfuhl
22W–27L career · 15 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Aaron Sinclair
15W–30L career · 23 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Chantel Freeman
39W–39L career · 39 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
David LeBreton
7W–13L career · type A · 8 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.93
3
Abby Morse
20W–35L career · 32 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Christopher Hess
4W–4L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ellen Sweetman
20W–32L career · 20 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Jennifer Sillars
10W–28L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Tracey
21W–49L career · 33 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mignon Hess
30W–34L career · 29 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheryl Scobel
4W–17L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Warren Griffin
17W–42L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.