Teams

SCTA/Michael Dunlap

2025 SCTA Spring '25 - USTA Mixed 40 & Over · Mixed 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-16vs Summer Grove - ChaconLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrooke Moore / Darryl Brunk vs Matt Akey / Janelle Akey2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLauren Gleaton / Benjamin Smith vs Wladimir Chacon / Dawn Stiehl4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesShannon Castellow / Michael Dunlap vs Lisa Wettstein / Kevin Morris6-4, 6-4
2025-04-14vs Summer Grove - ChaconWon 21
W#1 DoublesDylan Christensen / Brooke Moore vs Kong Phachanh / Cindy Kellman3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Dunlap / Lauren Gleaton vs Wladimir Chacon / Lesli O'Neill6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Hasberger / Paula Hasberger vs William Balboa / Angela Galusha4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Erin Stoots
published
3.61
Brooke Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.57
Lauren Gleaton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Stacee Mceldoon
published
3.33
Shannon Castellow
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Brian Hasberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Michael Dunlap
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Joseph Geter
published
3.23
Beth Ellis
published 3.5
3.02
Darryl Brunk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Paula Hasberger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Dylan Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Allred
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Hasberger + Brian Hasberger2549% gamesnot enough data
Michael Dunlap + Brooke Moore2349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Stoots
28W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.68
3.5
Brooke Moore
36W–33L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.61
Lauren Gleaton
48W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%30%70%
3.57
Stacee Mceldoon
25W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Shannon Castellow
17W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Brian Hasberger
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Michael Dunlap
22W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Joseph Geter
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Beth Ellis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Darryl Brunk
5W–6L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
Paula Hasberger
15W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Dylan Christensen
8W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marc Allred
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.