Teams

Stamelos

MTTL - Women's · 3.5 Division

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-13vs Summer LoveLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristy Briggs / Jennifer Lucas vs Jessica Davis / Ashley Howard6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKerri Frye / Rebecca Gilbert vs Aimee Lawson / Stacy Perry2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKristin Price / Sarah Wilson vs Erin Taylor / Beth Sather6-4, 6-1
2026-08-06vs Hitmakers 3.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Centers / Libbie Rohan vs Ginger Childs / Amanda Han6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSarah Wilson / Jaclyn Smith vs Tanya Petrucha / Ruthann Ross3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMary Stamelos / Christy Briggs vs Cristin Roark / Marina Messier6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-23vs Net AssetsWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristy Briggs / Jennifer Lucas vs Linda Ashford / Mary Candice Burger6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Wilson / Libbie Rohan vs Glenda Anderson / Susan Brown6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMary Stamelos / Stephanie Buhalis vs Trudy Sullivan / Angela Robbins3-6, 5-7
2026-07-16vs Deuce BagsWon 21
W#1 DoublesLibbie Rohan / Elizabeth Centers vs Kristen Morrison / Amy Robbins1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJaclyn Smith / Katherine Church vs Abby Slagle / Stephanie Nelson5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Wilson / Kerri Frye vs Sally Goodrich / Amy Frankel Nau6-3, 7-6
2026-07-09vs Summer FunLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristy Briggs / Libbie Rohan vs Stacey Wade / Nicole Keenan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Gilbert / Kerri Frye vs Karen Pillans / Mary Glennon7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAmanda Ricciardi / Mary Stamelos vs Elizabeth Braithwaite / Ashley Snipes5-7, 5-7
2026-06-25vs Wilson/HadleyLost 12
W#1 DoublesStephanie Buhalis / Katherine Church vs Christie Bautch / Megan de la O6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Wilson / Amanda Ricciardi vs Kaelin Cramer / Traci Gilbert-Stafford0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKristin Price / Elizabeth Centers vs Melissa Hobbs / Karen Griffin5-7, 3-6
2026-06-11vs It’s Too Hot for TennisLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Centers / Katherine Church vs Jennifer Jones / Karie Duke6-7, 2-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Lucas / Jaclyn Smith vs Lisa Freund / Lori Nixon6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Price / Stephanie Buhalis vs Janet McMeen / Brenda Maddaleni6-3, 6-1
2026-06-10vs Let’s Talk About Sets!Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJaclyn Smith / Libbie Rohan vs Marian Vangeli / Nina Kumar4-6, 3-3
L#2 DoublesKerri Frye / Amanda Ricciardi vs Sonja Plumlee / Lauren Wideman2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Gilbert / Mary Stamelos vs Jenny Neeley / Elizabeth Neighbors3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Division have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Libbie Rohan
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.28
Christy Briggs
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.22
Katherine Church
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.13
Stephanie Buhalis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.06
Kerri Frye
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Kim Thompson
published
2.94
Kristin Price
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Elizabeth Centers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.92
Amanda Ricciardi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Jaclyn Smith
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Rebecca Gilbert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Mary Stamelos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Stamelos + Christy Briggs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Libbie Rohan
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.52
3.5
Christy Briggs
26W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Katherine Church
9W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Stephanie Buhalis
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Kerri Frye
8W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kim Thompson
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.06
Kristin Price
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Elizabeth Centers
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
3
Amanda Ricciardi
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Jaclyn Smith
7W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
2.85
Rebecca Gilbert
15W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Mary Stamelos
6W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.