Teams

MARION/Walsh/Women/8.0

2023 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-19vs SKY - PayneLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Garrick / Barbara Slatton vs Linda Lademann / Sarah Collinson6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-14vs FK - HatfieldWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Garrick / Diane Stablein vs Donna Jarvis / Kimberly Scudder Thompson6-1, 6-1
2023-03-11vs FK - Ms.HitsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Stablein / Valerie Elvin vs Eileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-26vs SKY - PayneWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Stablein / Valerie Elvin vs Suzanne Busk / Debra Malone6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-25vs Villages - Hoops/SchappellLost 02
L#2 DoublesDiane Stablein / Valerie Elvin vs Linda Jones / Erica Migliorati6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBarbara Slatton / Tina Shuman vs Judy Hoops / Yvonne Schappell4-6, 3-6
2023-02-04vs FK - Ms.HitsLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Garrick / Marti Little vs Eileen Lombardo / Beth Riendeau4-6, 3-6
2023-01-28vs FK - HatfieldWon 21
L#1 DoublesValerie Elvin / Diane Stablein vs Nancy Little / Pamela Plumlee2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTina Shuman / Barbara Slatton vs Kathy Hatfield / Kirstin Burri6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarianne Marcoux / Susan Garrick vs Kimberly Scudder Thompson / Donna Jarvis6-1, 7-5
2023-01-21vs Villages - Hoops/SchappellSplit 11
W#1 DoublesValerie Elvin / Diane Stablein vs Judy Hoops / Yvonne Schappell6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarti Little / Susan Garrick vs Elaine Parker / Beverly Gates6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Diane Stablein
published 4
3.50
Valerie Elvin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Marianne Marcoux
published
3.34
Mary Jeanne Walsh
published
3.11
Barbara Slatton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jan Cole
published
Jill Kimball
published
Lisa Degirolami
published
Susan Garrick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Elvin + Diane Stablein4163% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Slatton + Marianne Marcoux134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Stablein
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · 5 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.50
Marianne Marcoux
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
3.46
Mary Jeanne Walsh
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Barbara Slatton
33W–113L career · 3 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.11
Jan Cole
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Kimball
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Degirolami
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Garrick
52W–70L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.