Teams

Woodside - Hules

2025 CSRATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring '25 · Women 3.5 Day

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-01vs CCRC - CassellLost 02
L#1 DoublesKristen Elmshaeuser / Brooke Homan vs Terri Finch / Elizabeth Lindroth3-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLori Pope / Melissa Bunney vs Leah Cassell / Nancy Akers2-6, 3-6
2025-03-26vs RVP - LandonLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrooke Homan / Angela Magnuson vs Laurel Landon / MacEy Miller7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#4 DoublesMelissa Bunney / Lori Pope vs Kelly Mercier / Katherine Granillo4-6, 4-6
2025-03-17vs CCRC - OlmsteadLost 02
L#1 SinglesGina Konn vs Dori Brooks7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAngie Osbon / Melissa Bunney vs Jennifer Olmstead / Judith Sexton1-6, 4-6
2025-03-03vs NTC - PhillipsWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrooke Homan / Melissa Bunney vs Karen Fulton / Tracie Addyman6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-24vs Fleming TC - DavidsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDana Davis / Angela Magnuson vs Rachel Stephens / Jennifer Kaminstein7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLori Pope / Kristen Elmshaeuser vs Dori Cash / Tina Vogl6-1, 6-2
2025-02-17vs Burke County - WestinWon 30
W#1 DoublesAngela Magnuson / Kristina Topp vs Cynthia White / Beth Bryan6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDee Dee Redd / Lori Pope vs Charlotte Thompson / Alison Hodges6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesMelissa Bunney / Brooke Homan vs Tiara Tauaese / Qingdan Wu3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-10vs RVP - FralickSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrooke Homan / Kristina Topp vs Karen Fralick / Michele Flanders6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#4 DoublesLori Pope / Melissa Bunney vs Taylor Childress / Grace Flanders7-6, 6-2
2025-02-03vs CCRC - JohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDee Dee Redd / Lori Pope vs Leslie Sprague / Ashley Pracht7-6, 6-1
2025-01-13vs Woodside - HulesWon 30
W#2 DoublesDee Dee Redd / Lori Pope vs Joy Hules / Lauren Duckworth6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrooke Homan / Agnes Hobson vs Dowtin McKnight / Valerie Parks6-1, 6-2
W#4 DoublesKristen Elmshaeuser / Melissa Bunney vs Mercedes Kucyk / Helen Faulk6-0, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Angela Magnuson
usually #4 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.53
Lori Pope
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #4 Doubles 30% · published
3.38
Sallie Brinkley
published
3.38
Brooke Homan
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.37
Vicky Westland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Gina Konn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Sharon McKool
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.28
Susan Podolin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
Deb Royer
published 3.5
3.17
Sharina Ramage
published
3.07
Joy Hules
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.06
Kristen Burns
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Melissa Bunney
usually #4 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Elizabeth Bushnell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jan Bogardus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Magnuson + Lori Pope4167% games+8.9% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Lori Pope8455% games+3.0% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Angela Magnuson231060% games+2.5% vs expected
Susan Podolin + Sharon McKool251253% games+1.9% vs expected
Brooke Homan + Melissa Bunney3346% games−6.8% vs expected
Lori Pope + Melissa Bunney3348% gamesnot enough data
Lori Pope + Sallie Brinkley314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Bushnell + Melissa Bunney134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Angela Magnuson
81W–36L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.63
Lori Pope
80W–41L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Sallie Brinkley
37W–27L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Brooke Homan
69W–55L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Vicky Westland
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.37
Gina Konn
53W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Sharon McKool
36W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Susan Podolin
30W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Deb Royer
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sharina Ramage
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Joy Hules
10W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kristen Burns
17W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.06
Melissa Bunney
45W–56L career · 11 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Elizabeth Bushnell
5W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jan Bogardus
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.