Teams

SAN CARLOS TC/ARGUELLO PK 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Philip Thomas
published
3.70
Carter Chang
published 4
3.65
Glen Lipka
published
3.62
Max Shevyakov
published
3.61
Nancy Miyasaki
published
3.58
Katja Gagen
published
3.53
Maria Vegas
published
3.52
Faye Chu
published
3.51
Tom Chiang
published
3.48
Max Kwok
published
3.48
3.39
Ashi Labouisse
published 3.5
3.35
Elizabeth Lougee
published
3.33
Gail Fong
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.22
Leslie Doohan
published
3.21
Bob Whitaker
published 3.5
3.18
Leila Mehra
published
3.15
Nathan Czubaj
published
3.13
Lauren Sagan
published
3.02
Jonathan Feldman
published
2.79
Elaine Chong
published
Pete Torres
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Vegas + Nathan Czubaj314 matchesnot enough data
Glen Lipka + Elaine Chong303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Philip Thomas
27W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.81
4
Carter Chang
7W–17L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Glen Lipka
17W–20L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.65
Max Shevyakov
7W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.62
Nancy Miyasaki
35W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.61
Katja Gagen
36W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
3.58
Maria Vegas
27W–36L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Faye Chu
19W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Tom Chiang
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Max Kwok
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
Ymanol Valdes MacHado
10W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
3.48
3.5
Ashi Labouisse
20W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Elizabeth Lougee
23W–31L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Gail Fong
100W–56L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Leslie Doohan
23W–11L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Bob Whitaker
15W–30L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Leila Mehra
17W–11L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Nathan Czubaj
19W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.15
Lauren Sagan
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.13
Jonathan Feldman
8W–11L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Elaine Chong
42W–27L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.79
Pete Torres
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.