Teams

Miller-55/6.5/M-Francos

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men night

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming
Sep 19 9:45 AM
vs N/A
Fred Miller
Sep 23 6:00 PM
Franco's Athletic Club
Sep 26 8:00 AM
Pelican Athletic Club
Oct 8 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Fred Miller
Oct 15 6:30 PM
Stone Creek Club and Spa
Oct 17 8:00 AM
Franco's Athletic Club
Oct 21 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Fred Miller
Flight standings3 teams · Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Arthur-55/6.5/M-StoneCreek1021425
2Miller-55/6.5/M-Francos1142652
3Maloney/Matherne-55/6.5/M-Genesis0103634

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
David Bachemin
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published 3.5
3.29
Bryan Quarls
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Eric Stegen
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.21
CLAY BENTON
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.10
Bill Bass
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.00
Amintas Major
usually #1 Doubles 95%, also #2 Doubles 5% · published 3
2.72
Adam Scarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.55
Jody Harper
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.27
Dennis Dallimore
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Jim Davies
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
John Munoz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
John Shylock
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Mark Glassett
usually #3 Doubles 59%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Mark Mercante
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 7% · published
Randy Hasling
usually #3 Doubles 68%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Robert Barrosse
usually #3 Doubles 82%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published
Ted Ashby
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Timothy Hoy
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
William Knight
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Shylock + Amintas Major7360% gamesnot enough data
Robert Barrosse + Mark Glassett3255% gamesnot enough data
Adam Scarbrough + Mark Glassett1438% gamesnot enough data
Eric Stegen + Timothy Hoy134 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Hoy + Randy Hasling134 matchesnot enough data
Bill Bass + Timothy Hoy213 matchesnot enough data
Bill Bass + Adam Scarbrough123 matchesnot enough data
Robert Barrosse + Randy Hasling123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Bachemin
13W–14L career · 13 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Bryan Quarls
11W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Eric Stegen
7W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
CLAY BENTON
13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Bill Bass
17W–22L career · 20 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Amintas Major
16W–8L career · type S · 20 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Adam Scarbrough
14W–33L career · 26 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
Jody Harper
12W–46L career · 18 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
2.55
2.5
Dennis Dallimore
1W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Jim Davies
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Munoz
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
John Shylock
39W–31L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Glassett
19W–47L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
Mark Mercante
8W–6L career · 14 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Hasling
14W–27L career · 19 lines in 2026
not enough data
Robert Barrosse
14W–18L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ted Ashby
37W–29L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Hoy
13W–25L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
William Knight
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.