Teams

Cinco Ranch Westridge - Wild Cards

2025 HTA Spring NA - Ladies Doubles Friday · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesGresly Ortiz / Monica Vidalon vs Viviana Corredor / Cristina Goolsby0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Turner / Jennifer Card vs Mindy Cabble / Luana Pereira4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Flores / Vibeke Ryan vs Joy Ku / Kathleen Rosseland6-3, 7-5
L#4 DoublesJennifer Williams / Alyssa Newcomb vs Lori Hanish / Tina Nguyen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesPatricia Davey / Gresly Ortiz vs Joanne Hresko / Monica Rayburn6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMarilyn Flores / Carmen Navarro vs Kelly Kinch / Mimi Tarantino5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMarien Borges / Tracy Rolling vs Rebecca Wells / Kathleen Rosseland6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#4 DoublesVicki Galloway / Jennifer Williams vs Tina Nguyen / Joy Zheng4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Gresly Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Patricia Davey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Vibeke Ryan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Carmen Navarro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Marien Borges
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Vicki Galloway
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Monica Vidalon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Marilyn Flores
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Tracy Rolling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Jennifer Card
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Lisa Turner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Alyssa Newcomb
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Rolling + Vibeke Ryan4453% games+0.3% vs expected
Tracy Rolling + Jennifer Card7452% games−2.0% vs expected
Lisa Turner + Marien Borges314 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Rolling + Marilyn Flores123 matchesnot enough data
Vibeke Ryan + Vicki Galloway213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gresly Ortiz
15W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
Patricia Davey
21W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Vibeke Ryan
24W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.39
Carmen Navarro
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Marien Borges
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Vicki Galloway
16W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Monica Vidalon
9W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
Marilyn Flores
10W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Tracy Rolling
19W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.19
Jennifer Card
12W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%<1%
3.16
Lisa Turner
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Alyssa Newcomb
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.