Teams

Lakeside Advantage

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Weekend Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-02vs ACAC Pfeiffer New PoachersLost 01
L#1 SinglesLyman Brown vs Doug Okay5-7, 2-6
2024-05-12Lost 01
L#2 SinglesLyman Brown vs Lee Wilson1-6, 1-6
2024-05-09vs MAC LozaLost 02
L#1 DoublesJay Abbud / Edward Yesbeck vs David Brown / Juan Loza3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesLyman Brown vs Matthew Morris6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2024-04-28Won 10
W#2 SinglesLyman Brown vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-24vs Hermitage - SaduskyLost 02
L#1 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Jay Abbud vs Bryan Fisher / Mac Stuckey2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLyman Brown / Vernon Heishman vs Daniel Sadusky / Kelby Morgan3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-04-14vs Raintree Raghavan Weekend WarriorsLost 02
L#2 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Matthew Earle vs Eddie Parker / ED Fuhr1-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesLyman Brown vs Matthew Sheehan3-6, 0-6
2024-04-07vs MTC Stephens' ResurgenceLost 02
L#1 DoublesSam McKelvey / Jay Abbud vs Wieslaw Gumulak / Ken Patterson1-6, 0-2
L#3 DoublesLyman Brown / Dwight Ludwig vs Don Busick / Greg Deeb6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Weekend Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sam McKelvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Andy Tucker
published 4
3.74
Eric Ludwig
published 4
3.73
Dwight Ludwig
published 4
3.68
Matthew Earle
published
3.64
Edward Yesbeck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.64
Jay Abbud
published
3.62
Michael Hazelwood
published
3.60
William Cosby
published
3.56
Alton Howell
published 4
3.54
Lyman Brown
usually #2 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.37
Vernon Heishman
published
3.33
Jeff Richman
published
Ryan Pelais
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lyman Brown + Sam McKelvey2451% gamesnot enough data
Lyman Brown + Jeff Richman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sam McKelvey
158W–91L career · 1 line in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Andy Tucker
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Eric Ludwig
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Dwight Ludwig
8W–6L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Matthew Earle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Edward Yesbeck
127W–115L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Jay Abbud
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Michael Hazelwood
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
William Cosby
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Alton Howell
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Lyman Brown
183W–205L career · 7 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.54
Vernon Heishman
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.37
Jeff Richman
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
3.33
Ryan Pelais
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.