Teams

Sarasota - LWR/Varsity Girls

2022 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Monday

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-21vs Longwood HallSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Bartlett / Maureen Meaney vs Sigi Moriece / Jill Bressler7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Cunningham / Jamie Reagan vs Mary Denham / Beverly Austgen6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-14vs Mission Valley ZentzSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeona Harris / Maureen Meaney vs Mary Foxwell / CHIEKO OHRSTROM1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJamie Reagan / Patricia Cunningham vs Ann Larabee / Loretta Kille6-3, 6-1
2022-03-07vs Meadows Pink YaYa'sWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Bartlett / Maureen Meaney vs Karen Matthews / Christa Ruppert6-3, 6-3
2022-02-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesJamie Reagan / Patricia Cunningham vs Jeanne Peech / Barbara Komarin6-3, 6-3
2022-02-14vs University Park BarryWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Bartlett / Maureen Meaney vs Ursula Ruckli / Pamela Mathews7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-07vs Longwood HallWon 10
W#2 DoublesMaureen Meaney / Nancy Bartlett vs Beverly Austgen / Sigi Moriece7-6, 6-0
2022-01-31vs Plantation TippettSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNancy Bartlett / Maureen Meaney vs Jacki Kilian / Carol LaRose6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLori George / Patricia Cunningham vs Mae Rose / Victoria Ryan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-01-24Won 20
W#1 DoublesNancy Bartlett / Maureen Meaney vs Mary Dykun / Jean Gramaglia6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCarol Somers / Patricia Cunningham vs Abbie Gross / Carol Hill6-4, 6-3
2022-01-17vs Mission Valley ZentzWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Bartlett / Maureen Meaney vs Karen Ingrando / Susan Terry6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Nancy Bartlett
published
3.20
Jamie Reagan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Emily Ebers
published 3.5
Leona Harris
published
Linda Frazier
published
Maureen Meaney
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
Patricia Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Ricki Rubin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patricia Cunningham + Jamie Reagan252451% gamesnot enough data
Linda Frazier + Jamie Reagan23763% gamesnot enough data
Patricia Cunningham + Nancy Bartlett2346% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Meaney + Patricia Cunningham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Bartlett
13W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jamie Reagan
113W–97L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Emily Ebers
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.05
Leona Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Frazier
115W–82L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Meaney
46W–37L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Patricia Cunningham
112W–93L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ricki Rubin
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.