Teams

Macia

2021 Montgomery Combo Fall · Combo Women 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-11vs Wonder WomenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNicole Ifill / Valerie Stoehr vs PAULA SMITH / Bernadette Walker6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYvette Fontenot / Robin Rudowitz vs Wendy Carey / Mary Beth Etherton1-6, 2-6
2021-12-04vs SpeirsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Hafey / Nicole Ifill vs Kerry Spicer / Stephanie Richards7-6, 6-1
2021-11-18vs The MojitosWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmy Hafey / Heather Schreiber vs Alison Serino / Nancy Trimble6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesValerie Stoehr / Nicole Ifill vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-13vs Tennis AnglersWon 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Ifill / Amy Hafey vs Carolle Marie Oneil / Lisa Kokoszka7-6, 6-2
2021-11-02vs SpeirsWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Schreiber / Amy Hafey vs Sarah Speirs / Pamela Dean6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNicole Ifill / Simone Feldman vs Kristina Leary / Stephanie Richards5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-27vs Wonder WomenWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Hafey / Nicole Ifill vs Gillian Moorhead / Mary Beth Etherton6-3, 6-3
2021-10-24vs RubinoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesNicole Ifill / Kimberly Mielcarek vs Frances Brennan / Heather Sine3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmy Hafey / Heather Schreiber vs Kim Hazel / Carolyn Greis6-2, 6-4
2021-10-06vs Tennis AnglersLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicole Ifill / Elizabeth Pugh vs Janet Opar / Linda Shaffer6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Simone Feldman
published
3.96
Amy Hafey
published 4
3.72
Heather Schreiber
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Elizabeth Pugh
published 3.5
3.53
Nicole Ifill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.24
Yvette Fontenot
published
3.23
Betsy Mencher
published 3.5
2.88
Robin Rudowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Carey Greenauer
published 3
2.66
Dora Macia
published 3
Marjorie Goldman
published
Rosanne Johnston
published
Valerie Stoehr
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Simone Feldman
79W–66L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
4.26
4
Amy Hafey
98W–55L career · no lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Heather Schreiber
110W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Elizabeth Pugh
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%18%82%
3.62
3.5
Nicole Ifill
253W–215L career · 14 lines in 2021
<1%41%59%
3.53
Yvette Fontenot
17W–27L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Betsy Mencher
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Robin Rudowitz
25W–52L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Carey Greenauer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Dora Macia
3W–2L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66
Marjorie Goldman
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Rosanne Johnston
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Valerie Stoehr
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.