Teams

5 JRHS Stephens 4.5

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-16vs 3 MAC SnowSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Keith Adams vs James Cooke / John Foust6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesWarren Smigo / Seunghun Ok vs Holland Gravely / Donnell Stewart5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Greg Deeb vs Michael Shafer / Scott Sorkin5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Richman / Warren Smigo vs Brad Burch / Robert Clarkson2-6, 4-6
2023-07-09vs 4 SCC Miller/DrewLost 02
L#1 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Jeff Richman vs Stuart Fulcher / David Voth0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesWarren Smigo / Greg Deeb vs Drew Lineberger / Michael Miller0-6, 2-6
2023-07-07vs 4 SCC Miller/DrewLost 01
L#2 DoublesGreg Deeb / Warren Smigo vs David Voth / Todd Prince3-6, 1-6
2023-07-02vs 3 MAC SnowWon 10
W#2 DoublesRomeo Cinco / Warren Smigo vs J Ronald Fleming / Wayne Motley7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLuis Rodriguez-Miranda / Warren Smigo vs Michael Shafer / Joseph Cappellino2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Andrew Novak vs William Carli / Byron Holmes4-6, 4-6
2023-06-11vs 2 Morgan’s Stand at BelmontLost 01
L#1 DoublesJimmy Ghaphery / Warren Smigo vs Sung Kang / Jay Nelson5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Novak
published 4.5
3.97
Jimmy Ghaphery
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.85
James Holland
published 4
3.80
Keith Adams
published
3.77
Chris Gillam
published 4
Greg Deeb
published 4
3.67
Warren Smigo
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.66
Seunghun Ok
published
3.33
Jeff Richman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Holland + Keith Adams5156% games+6.2% vs expected
Warren Smigo + Jimmy Ghaphery4447% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Novak
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Jimmy Ghaphery
61W–90L career · 5 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.97
4
James Holland
28W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
3.85
Keith Adams
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.80
4
Chris Gillam
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Greg Deeb
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Warren Smigo
72W–159L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
Seunghun Ok
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%<1%
3.66
Jeff Richman
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.33

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.