Teams

BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM7.5B

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-25vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM7.5GSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Fu / Adam Li vs Paul Chen / David Brenes6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTed Chen / Qing Feng vs John Zed / Yang Song6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-10-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Li / Andrew Huang vs Charles Lin / Howard Huang6-2, 6-2
2025-09-15vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM7.5GWon 10
W#3 DoublesPeng Qu / Qing Feng vs Paul Chen / Robert Chien6-4, 6-4
2025-09-11vs SUNNYVALE MTC CM7.5FLost 01
L#2 DoublesKevin Fu / Harry Zheng vs SHAOBO XU / Liwei Zhou7-6, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Ryan Low
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Joseph Huang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.77
Jair Saavedra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Paul Kwon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Ted Chen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Jean-Marc Cabrol
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Qing Feng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Peng Qu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
Spencer Huang
published
3.31
Kevin Fu
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Billy Yuen
published 3.5
3.12
Harry Zheng
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Adam Li
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Zhenhang Liu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peng Qu + Paul Kwon1438% games−8.1% vs expected
Ryan Low + Paul Kwon303 matchesnot enough data
Jair Saavedra + Spencer Huang123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Low
59W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Joseph Huang
29W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Jair Saavedra
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Paul Kwon
23W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.63
Ted Chen
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.63
Jean-Marc Cabrol
33W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Qing Feng
29W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
Peng Qu
13W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Spencer Huang
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
3.49
Kevin Fu
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.31
3.5
Billy Yuen
8W–14L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Harry Zheng
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Adam Li
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
Zhenhang Liu
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.