Teams

Bryan - RS Clay

2021 Escambia Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-13vs Bonsignore - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Amy R Falzone vs Jeannette Fabbro / Sue Nast6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-07vs Penn - PACWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Bryan / Elizabeth Elliott vs Jenya Burkett / Arron Cravatt6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-13vs Bonsignore - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Elizabeth Elliott vs Terry Armstrong / Vicki Carson2-6, 4-6
2021-04-07vs Bonsignore - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesMary Bryan / Elizabeth Elliott vs Susan Bonsignore / Vicki Carson4-6, 5-7
2021-04-06Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Elliott / Mary Bryan vs Kathy Justice / Stacey Sloan6-7, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Creagh Ekelund
published 3.5
3.23
Mary Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.21
Carolyn Moore
published 3
2.72
Amy R Falzone
published 3
Jeshua Reddecliff
published
Kate Major
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Elizabeth Elliott
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.66
3.5
Creagh Ekelund
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Bryan
74W–123L career · 5 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Carolyn Moore
8W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Amy R Falzone
6W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.72
Jeshua Reddecliff
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kate Major
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.