Teams

HPTA

Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women - DelChes-Tues

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / PHILADELPHIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-10vs St Albans Wise AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesDana Careless / Kate Savitz vs Laurie Burstein-Maxwell / Megan Mucksavage6-3, 6-2
2025-05-27vs Cynwyd Rising RacquetsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDana Careless / Lauren Ferst vs Katie Frechette / Jenna Mersky6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMegan Hiser / Kate Savitz vs Kyra McGrath / Kathryn Spergel4-6, 2-6
2025-05-20vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Ferst / Erika Kaufman vs Christine Shindler / Amy Cohen2-6, 0-6
2025-05-13vs St Albans Wise AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Ferst / Erika Kaufman vs Kari Kohn / Donna Foster2-6, 1-6
2025-05-06vs Cynwyd Rising RacquetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Ferst / Erika Kaufman vs Jenna Mersky / Kathryn Spergel1-6, 3-6
2025-04-29vs Match MakersLost 01
L#1 DoublesErika Kaufman / Lauren Ferst vs Andria Janos / Betsy Helm3-6, 3-6
2025-04-22vs That's What She SetWon 20
W#1 DoublesLauren Ferst / Erika Kaufman vs Lauren Calabretti / Mary Peifer2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDana Careless vs Julie McHugh6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings19 teams · 2.5 Women - DelChes-Tues
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Match Makers059613100
2HPTA057818131
3Stingers0681024164
4St Albans Wise Aces0716513129
5Get a Grip- Whitford0781328214
6Dub C Deuces0820411145
7Ace Ace Baby08141020183
8No Strings Attached- Whitford08111328214
9Net Profits08101431210
10Luv Luv Kiss Kiss0891533236
11Frog Hollow's Net Gains0918922210
12That's What She Set09131432240
13Cynwyd Rising Racquets09111634236
14Sets and the City09101735242
15BCRC Bad Aces09101735254
16The Racquettes09101738274
17Baby Got Backhand01021919208
18Drop Shots010171333269
19Waynesborough010121840302

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.91 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dana Careless
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.05
Lauren Ferst
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.77
Erika Kaufman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julio Toledo Lopez
published
Kate Savitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Megan Hiser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Ferst + Erika Kaufman1430% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Dana Careless
4W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Ferst
3W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Erika Kaufman
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.77
Julio Toledo Lopez
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kate Savitz
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Hiser
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.