Teams

Zurn/Larsen- Northern Heights 18+ S23

2023 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-24Won 10
W#1 SinglesEmily Arndt vs Shannon Ellis6-2, 6-4
2023-07-10vs Hobbs 18+ S23Won 10
W#3 DoublesKatelyn Zurn / Emily Arndt vs Jennie Ollila / Susan Ledray6-1, 6-3
2023-06-26vs Dehn/Wernet 18+ 3.5 S23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEmily Arndt / Alexandra Hilst vs Angel Nasrabadi / Heidi Rose0-6, 1-6
2023-06-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Arndt / Katelyn Zurn vs Elizabeth Dimian / Sydney Hubbard6-2, 6-4
2023-06-12vs Overdahl/Dymit 18+ S23Won 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Arndt / Alexandra Hilst vs Shannon Ellis / Katie Halverson6-3, 6-4
2023-06-05vs Harris/Hurd-ing Cats 18+ S23Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Arndt / Katelyn Zurn vs Jacie Hurd / Kathryn Schneider6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Amy Stern
published 4
3.77
Whitney Nyholm
published 4
3.68
Perris Deppa
published
3.60
Katie Day
published
3.60
Lina Wang
published
3.44
Emily Arndt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.44
Jessica Yineman
published
3.32
Alexandra Hilst
published 3.5
3.26
Irina Hogetvedt
published
Danielle Stewart
published 3
Sarah van Camp
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Stern + Katie Day6353% games−0.4% vs expected
Lina Wang + Emily Arndt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Stern
22W–14L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.85
4
Whitney Nyholm
41W–25L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Perris Deppa
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
Katie Day
12W–12L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Lina Wang
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
25%75%<1%
3.60
Emily Arndt
112W–89L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%65%34%
3.44
Jessica Yineman
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44
3.5
Alexandra Hilst
49W–50L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.32
Irina Hogetvedt
6W–16L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3
Danielle Stewart
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah van Camp
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.