Teams

Schartz - BHSC Warhogs

2025 Charlottesville Singles · Charlottesville Singles 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-15vs Dellimore - ACAC AcesWon 20
W#1 SinglesCristian Ferrer vs Jonathan Proffitt6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTodd Sechser vs Ruoyu Zhang6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-13vs Harmon - Spin DoctorsWon 21
W#1 SinglesCristian Ferrer vs Damian Doyle6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTodd Sechser vs Aaron Streit7-6, 7-5
L#3 SinglesBrandon Schartz vs Mark Illgner6-7, 3-2
2025-10-06vs Shahane - KeswickWon 20
W#1 SinglesReid Phillips vs John McNeil6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesBrandon Schartz vs Greg Benham6-0, 6-1
2025-10-02vs Harmon - Spin DoctorsWon 30
W#1 SinglesRobert Cueva vs Thomas Jackson7-5, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAndrew Juge vs Aaron Streit5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 SinglesReid Phillips vs Mark Illgner6-1, 6-4
2025-09-24vs Shahane - KeswickWon 30
W#1 SinglesTodd Sechser vs John McNeil6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRobert Cueva vs Amit Shahane6-4, 6-1
W#3 SinglesCristian Ferrer vs Sean Mullins6-1, 6-1
2025-09-22vs Dellimore - ACAC AcesWon 21
W#1 SinglesCristian Ferrer vs Ruoyu Zhang6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesTodd Sechser vs Chris Stambaugh3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesJay Bolus vs Ramzi Talhouk6-3, 7-5
2025-09-10vs Dellimore - ACAC AcesLost 12
W#1 SinglesCristian Ferrer vs Ramzi Talhouk6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesAndrew Juge vs Harris Haynie4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBrandon Schartz vs Jonathan Proffitt2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-08vs Harmon - Spin DoctorsWon 30
W#1 SinglesTodd Sechser vs Aaron Streit6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRobert Cueva vs David Harmon6-1, 6-4
W#3 SinglesBrandon Schartz vs Rushman Andrews7-6, 6-1
2025-08-25vs Shahane - KeswickLost 12
L#1 SinglesAndrew Juge vs John McNeil1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Cueva vs Scott Bohmke1-6, 2-6
W#3 SinglesCristian Ferrer vs Greg Benham6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Charlottesville Singles 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.27 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cristian Ferrer
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 5
4.43
Reid Phillips
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
4.41
Todd Sechser
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
4.26
Brandon Schartz
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.25
Andrew Juge
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Jay Bolus
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
4.03
Robert Cueva
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Cristian Ferrer
6W–0L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Reid Phillips
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.43
Todd Sechser
14W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Brandon Schartz
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Andrew Juge
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.25
Jay Bolus
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
4.23
Robert Cueva
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
4.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.