Teams

BP GREEN

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-03vs NJ BLUESplit 11
L#1 SinglesJennifer Swartwout vs Megan Shibao3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGabriela Flora / Kristin Holmquist vs Ann Stafford / Leslie Haines6-2, 7-5
2024-08-28vs LPTC GREENWon 20
W#1 SinglesMadison Fortunato vs Kelsey Pobanz6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJennifer Swartwout / Karan Tierney vs Deborah Freischlag / Shannon Mooney6-1, 6-4
2024-08-20vs MC ORANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Swartwout / Gabriela Flora vs Shelley Flood / Marcella Lucas6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesHeidi Halus / Kristin Holmquist vs Ana Hunsinger / Hannah Tomlinson4-6, 2-6
2024-08-15vs NJ BLACKSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Wingert vs Terming Chew6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMadison Fortunato / Heidi Halus vs Julie Lochner / Pallavi Marulasiddappa2-6, 5-7
2024-07-23vs MC YELLOWWon 20
W#1 SinglesAlexandra Wingert vs ELIZABETH SKLAROFF6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Halus / Madison Fortunato vs Linda Manhkhong / Emily Webre6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Leslie Lane
published
3.90
Deanna Espejo
published 4
3.88
Heidi Halus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Alexandra Wingert
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.81
Madison Fortunato
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.55
Jennifer Swartwout
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.38
Kristin Holmquist
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Gabriela Flora
published
Karan Tierney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alexandra Wingert + Madison Fortunato7264% games+6.4% vs expected
Kristin Holmquist + Heidi Halus1544% games−11.2% vs expected
Kristin Holmquist + Jennifer Swartwout1537% gamesnot enough data
Gabriela Flora + Deanna Espejo224 matchesnot enough data
Madison Fortunato + Heidi Halus213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Lane
29W–23L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%1%
4.17
4
Deanna Espejo
23W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.90
4
Heidi Halus
61W–70L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Alexandra Wingert
69W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Madison Fortunato
38W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Deanna Ford Overdyke
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Jennifer Swartwout
29W–61L career · 3 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Kristin Holmquist
45W–53L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.38
Gabriela Flora
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karan Tierney
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.