Teams

Ma.Capobianco18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesVivek Nathan / Deraymes Harris vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-17vs Ga.Jimenez18ALost 01
L#2 DoublesNeil Shimer / Deraymes Harris vs Gabe Jimenez / Pedro Loaiza1-6, 0-6
2025-03-09vs Jo.Taylor18ALost 23
W#1 DoublesYoungjun Lee / Collin Carter vs Jeffrey Nottingham / Michael Painter6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJoshua Leon vs James Dorsett3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMason Dye / Randy Poteat vs William Ferrell / Joseph Cannon6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNelson Semple vs John Taylor3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesVivek Nathan / Neil Shimer vs Matt Wiggs / Colin Perry2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Youngjun Lee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.87
Seth Layton
published
3.84
Joshua Leon
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.83
Shravan Rajan
published
3.78
Collin Carter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.77
Josh Enderline
published
Bongsang Cho
published 4
3.66
Alex Piasecki
published 4
3.58
Deraymes Harris
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.57
Randy Poteat
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Matthew Capobianco
published
3.28
Mason Dye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Neil Shimer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nelson Semple
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Vivek Nathan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Seth Layton + Bongsang Cho404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Youngjun Lee
45W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.04
Seth Layton
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Joshua Leon
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.84
Shravan Rajan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Collin Carter
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%5%
3.78
Josh Enderline
5W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Bongsang Cho
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Alex Piasecki
12W–14L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Deraymes Harris
108W–51L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Randy Poteat
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
28%71%<1%
3.57
Matthew Capobianco
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Mason Dye
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
Neil Shimer
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nelson Semple
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vivek Nathan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.