Teams

MSIL 7.0 Mixed 55&O Sikora-Champaign

2024 Mixed Other 55 & Over · MSIL 7.0 Mixed 55&O

11 players · average NTRP 3.36 / MID-SOUTH ILLINOIS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesCharles Sikora / Clair Kaye vs Tod Nicholls / Sally Boland6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSatomi Baumgartner / THOMAS WILSON vs Rick McKirahan / Teri Scaggs1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesCharles Sikora / Clair Kaye vs Janet Hogan / Sean Miller6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKay Lindsay / Dan Maloney vs Sally Boland / Tod Nicholls0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesTHOMAS WILSON / Satomi Baumgartner vs Craig Conway / Kathleen Sigle6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristopher Stewart / Kay Lindsay vs Rick McKirahan / Teri Scaggs1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDan Maloney / Elizabeth Maloney vs Robert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTHOMAS WILSON / Clair Kaye vs Rick McKirahan / Teri Scaggs2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Stewart / Kay Lindsay vs Sean Miller / Celeste Ames0-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesTHOMAS WILSON / Mary Sandahl vs Tod Nicholls / Kathleen Sigle6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Sikora / Renee Brown vs Rick McKirahan / Ginny Kerwin4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesChristopher Stewart / Satomi Baumgartner vs Robert Vanhootegem / Janet Hogan2-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesTHOMAS WILSON / Renee Brown vs Craig Conway / Kathleen Sigle6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristopher Stewart / Mary Sandahl vs Rick McKirahan / Molly Tracy2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDan Maloney / Elizabeth Maloney vs Robert Vanhootegem / Celeste Ames2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MSIL 7.0 Mixed 55&O
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MSIL 7.0 Mixed 55&O Vanhootegem-Decatur60162691
2MSIL 7.0 Mixed 55&O Sikora-Champaign0621633203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Charles Sikora
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Dan Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Clair Kaye
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Satomi Baumgartner
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
THOMAS WILSON
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.04
Marla Golden
published 3.5
2.91
Kay Lindsay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elizabeth Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Sandahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Renee Brown
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Maloney + Elizabeth Maloney1433% gamesnot enough data
Renee Brown + Charles Sikora134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Sikora
41W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Dan Maloney
22W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Clair Kaye
91W–85L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Satomi Baumgartner
83W–46L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
THOMAS WILSON
36W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.10
3.5
Marla Golden
106W–135L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Kay Lindsay
73W–125L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Christopher Stewart
no matches on record · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Elizabeth Maloney
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Sandahl
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee Brown
24W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.