Teams

Mowery, Shelly

2022 Adult 18 & Over Summer 2.5W - 5.0 · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-06-09vs Andrew, MariaLost 23
L#1 DoublesShelly Mowery / Julie Kurland vs Lindsey Klusman / Tracy Farnsworth0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Lawrence vs Jamie Shrewsbury6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Coffey / Lauren Fouts vs Kelly Finn / Camille Potchad3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAshley Prieb vs Audra Laughman6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBrooke Cashion / Leslie Treas vs Jennifer Haake / Catherine Colwell0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Hether Lytton
published 3.5
3.17
Ashley Prieb
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.96
Annie Brown
published 3
2.88
Krissi Wagner
published
2.79
Bridget Pereira
published 3
2.79
Shelly Mowery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Julie Kurland
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Leslie Treas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Paulette Prieb
published
2.35
Brooke Cashion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dawn Rattan
published
Lauren Fouts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Lawrence
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Lisa Carroll
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Prieb + Annie Brown211654% games+3.8% vs expected
Krissi Wagner + Hether Lytton1444% games+2.4% vs expected
Krissi Wagner + Ashley Prieb1445% games−0.4% vs expected
Shelly Mowery + Krissi Wagner61045% games−2.3% vs expected
Bridget Pereira + Krissi Wagner1640% games−7.4% vs expected
Krissi Wagner + Annie Brown1541% games−9.8% vs expected
Lauren Lawrence + Annie Brown2447% gamesnot enough data
Leslie Treas + Paulette Prieb123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Hether Lytton
51W–49L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Ashley Prieb
42W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Annie Brown
54W–44L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
2.96
Krissi Wagner
71W–84L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%18%
2.88
3
Bridget Pereira
42W–81L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
Shelly Mowery
31W–39L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
Julie Kurland
5W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Christine Abraham
1W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leslie Treas
3W–21L career · 1 line in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.45
Paulette Prieb
9W–36L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
2.40
3
Brooke Cashion
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
Dawn Rattan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Fouts
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Lawrence
6W–12L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Carroll
6W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.