← Teams

THPRD-Hong/Hatfield

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 3.71 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Ellen Pearson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
—
Jian Zeng
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Atif Afzal
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.46
Jonathan Hong
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Celene Robert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Leo Edmunson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.81
Masafumi Inoue
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-11-03Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJian Zeng / Nina Nguyen vs Heike Droste / Srinivasa Kanamatha5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJonathan Hong / Joyce Wang vs Jamie Heberlein / Michael Davis1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2019-10-26Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesNina Nguyen / Leo Edmunson vs Ariana White / Keith Main6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoyce Wang / Jian Zeng vs Michele Sutherland / Albert Hensley6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEllen Pearson / Page Watts vs Casey Billings / Scott Reis6-3, 6-4
2019-10-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesJoyce Wang / Jian Zeng vs Janet Mills / Tom Wheatley7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMorganne Hatfield / Atif Afzal vs Doug Birch / Natalya Ramras7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAdam Oken / Celene Robert vs Ron Miolla / Pam Weider6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2019-10-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesEllen Pearson / Masafumi Inoue vs Kimberly Stockstad / Rob Laing6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJoyce Wang / Jian Zeng vs Kourtnie Katayama / Zach Bergthold6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMorganne Hatfield / Jonathan Hong vs Stephanie Haas / Michael Schroeder6-4, 6-2
2019-10-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesEllen Pearson / Masafumi Inoue vs Shawn Boyce / Dottie Quinn Jacobs6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLeo Edmunson / Morganne Hatfield vs Craig Walker / Laura Rundle7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAdam Oken / Celene Robert vs Mubashir Cheema / Kusum Mehndiratta7-5, 6-2
2019-10-06Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesJoyce Wang / Leo Edmunson vs D Michael Jones / Judi Babcock6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMorganne Hatfield / Jonathan Hong vs Jayne Mitchell / David Hoiland4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMasafumi Inoue / Ellen Pearson vs Douglas Metzker / Kristi Tompkins6-0, 6-2
2019-09-29Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesMorganne Hatfield / Atif Afzal vs Brent Grubb / Deborah Naugler6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJoyce Wang / Jian Zeng vs Christopher Thomas / Kristin Butler4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-09-08Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesAtif Afzal / Joyce Wang vs Robin Burak / Kevin Muck1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmanda Carkner / Jonathan Hong vs Mark Bernazzani / Irene Feldun7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLeo Edmunson / Nina Nguyen vs Heather Watkins / Matt Savage6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Ellen Pearson
32W–39L career
1%99%1%
4.20
4
Jian Zeng
54W–29L career
not enough data
—
4
Atif Afzal
52W–36L career
12%88%0%
3.63
3.5
Jonathan Hong
92W–73L career
0%80%20%
3.46
3.5
Celene Robert
26W–55L career
1%99%0%
3.27
3.5
Leo Edmunson
52W–45L career
7%93%0%
3.18
3
Masafumi Inoue
98W–92L career
1%95%3%
2.81

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.