Teams

Goode & Bradfield: Genesis

2026 Iowa Tri-Level League · 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women (West)

18 players · average NTRP 3.50 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-07-16vs Merfeld: DMGCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKim Bradfield / Leanna White vs Kayla Reusche / Hannah Fox6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKarin Beschen / Laura Hunt vs Danita Olafson / Nina Pack6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLauren Agnick / Anne Alesch vs Mary Everett / Michelle Mullin6-0, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-02vs Zinn-Burggraaf & Rice: DMGCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Pham / Dawn Ver Steeg vs Holly Shortenhaus / Cara O'Neill6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMitzi Hetherton / Ann Mincks vs Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf / Christen Bliss6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristine Halbrook / Kate Reis vs Jaime Morgan / Michele Staub6-2, 6-1
2026-06-25vs Carl: AmesWon 30
W#1 DoublesJanell Kallenbach / Anne Pham vs Jennifer Smith / Emma Katubig6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesKarin Beschen / Corinne Goode vs Summer Bao / Mary Beth Westercamp6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLauren Agnick / Val Hoefle vs Kirsten Hauge / Hennie Baek6-3, 6-1
2026-06-18vs Snedegar & Hagan: LifeTimeWon 30
W#1 DoublesTrinh Le-Coulter / Anne Pham vs Wendy Rickert / Cristen Schipper7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMitzi Hetherton / Ann Mincks vs Laura Draganov / Holli Keshwani6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Agnick / Anne Alesch vs Jinfeng Chen / Sarah Piziali6-2, 6-4
2026-06-11vs Bangtson: LifeTimeLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanell Kallenbach / Megan Kaufman vs Tina Duenow / Dina Dulaney7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Hunt / Lynae Szemplinski vs Cathy Fay / Aubrey Grant3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesVal Hoefle / Kate Reis vs Kathleen Lu / Shirley Weuve3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0-3.5-4.0 Women (West) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Dawn Ver Steeg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.85
Janell Kallenbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Megan Kaufman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.79
Trinh Le-Coulter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Anne Pham
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Kim Bradfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Leanna White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Lynae Szemplinski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Ann Mincks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Mitzi Hetherton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Laura Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Corinne Goode
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Karin Beschen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Anne Alesch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Kate Reis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Christine Halbrook
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Val Hoefle
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Lauren Agnick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ann Mincks + Karin Beschen6464% games+16.6% vs expected
Janell Kallenbach + Mitzi Hetherton3248% games+11.8% vs expected
Janell Kallenbach + Leanna White4161% games+10.3% vs expected
Christine Halbrook + Corinne Goode4165% gamesnot enough data
Kim Bradfield + Dawn Ver Steeg404 matchesnot enough data
Christine Halbrook + Val Hoefle224 matchesnot enough data
Kim Bradfield + Leanna White213 matchesnot enough data
Val Hoefle + Kate Reis033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dawn Ver Steeg
76W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.96
Janell Kallenbach
32W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.85
Megan Kaufman
24W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
Trinh Le-Coulter
12W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Anne Pham
99W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
Kim Bradfield
27W–39L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Leanna White
27W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
Lynae Szemplinski
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Ann Mincks
45W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Mitzi Hetherton
55W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
3.32
Laura Hunt
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Corinne Goode
58W–34L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%1%
3.22
Karin Beschen
40W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Anne Alesch
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
Kate Reis
25W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Christine Halbrook
28W–36L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Val Hoefle
29W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lauren Agnick
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.