Teams

CVTA RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

9 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs MEA GOLDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNicole Winterton / Carmen Gunn vs Paula King / Tamara Bodner5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBethany Sartell vs Brenda Ellis6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLori Canova / Susan Hoy vs Debbe Welsh / Janet Pierce6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Maryl Bergeson vs Suzanne Harper / Joan Bleacher6-7, 4-6
2021-07-20vs CVTA BLUEWon 31
L#1 DoublesMichelle Karr / Carmen Gunn vs Linda Schutter / Ruta Cariov6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBethany Sartell vs Beth Marvel4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Maryl Bergeson vs Aimee Snow / Carol Schwendener6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Hoy / Nicole Winterton vs WENDY BALL / Rebekah Harvey6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-07-15vs BRMST REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesCarmen Gunn / Maryl Bergeson vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Vickie Garn6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBethany Sartell vs Sandy Sutton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristine Lewis / Melissa Balcerak vs Cynthia Manley / Carol Anderson6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSusan Hoy / Lori Canova vs Kimberley Paulsen / Cheryl Williams6-3, 6-3
2021-07-08vs TTA BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarmen Gunn / Maryl Bergeson vs Mary Peonio / Sherry Cree3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Winterton vs Lindsay Madden6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLori Canova / Christine Lewis vs Catherine Jankowski / Deborah Zolfi6-4, 6-0
2021-06-24vs NJ VIOLETLost 12
L#1 DoublesMelissa Balcerak / Nicole Winterton vs Jill Mendoza / Dru Steinly2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Lewis / Maryl Bergeson vs Kira Moore / Gina Stroup6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarmen Gunn / Michelle Karr vs Renee Richker / Holly Bristol7-5, 6-4
2021-06-17vs MEA GOLDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSusan Hoy / Lori Canova vs Sarah Streett / Paula King6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesBethany Sartell vs Brenda Ellis6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMaryl Bergeson / Melissa Balcerak vs Susan McCall / Jacqueline Anderson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarmen Gunn / Nicole Winterton vs Jennifer Wells / Suzanne Harper6-3, 6-3
2021-06-10vs BRMST REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMaryl Bergeson / Christine Lewis vs Jill Bouck / Sandy Sutton6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNicole Winterton vs Stacey Mari0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusan Hoy / Lori Canova vs Cheryl Williams / Vickie Garn2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichelle Karr / Sally Vander Veer vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Cynthia Burchell6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bethany Sartell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Michelle Karr
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Sally Vander Veer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Melissa Balcerak
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Carmen Gunn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Lori Canova
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Maryl Bergeson
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Nicole Winterton
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Hoy
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Balcerak + Maryl Bergeson4453% games+1.1% vs expected
Maryl Bergeson + Carmen Gunn11553% games+0.3% vs expected
Sally Vander Veer + Susan Hoy3450% games−4.5% vs expected
Melissa Balcerak + Sally Vander Veer4544% games−5.9% vs expected
Sally Vander Veer + Carmen Gunn2542% games−8.4% vs expected
Michelle Karr + Carmen Gunn3448% games−12.7% vs expected
Nicole Winterton + Carmen Gunn6058% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Balcerak + Carmen Gunn2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bethany Sartell
37W–9L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Karr
36W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Sally Vander Veer
40W–45L career · 1 line in 2021
55%45%<1%
2.98
3
Melissa Balcerak
35W–58L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
2.87
3
Carmen Gunn
29W–31L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lori Canova
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maryl Bergeson
30W–29L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nicole Winterton
26W–26L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Hoy
28W–26L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.