Teams

TOC.Shukla

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-29vs KF.CollinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Stephanie Lee vs Carol Collins / Kristina Zeidler3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-24vs ACP.TandradinataWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Smita Shukla vs Abigail Holden / Laura Caldwell6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-09-11vs TOC.SheetsLost 02
L#1 DoublesTheresa Rosario-Jansen / Keeley McCormick vs Ingrid Holscher / Lindsay Strickland3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Martin / Smita Shukla vs Laura Brown / Silpa Yalamanchili3-6, 4-6
2024-09-08vs TOC.IrishSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Stephanie Lee vs Molly van Dyne / Stephanie Hanses6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSmita Shukla / Theresa Rosario-Jansen vs Jenna Wood / Caroline Irish5-7, 0-6
2024-08-25vs TING.LowranceSplit 11
L#2 DoublesKeeley McCormick / Kelli Harris vs Sharon Fadelici / Megan Havel3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSmita Shukla / Marina Barthalmus vs Colleen Sacco / Audrey Hollett6-2, 6-4
2024-08-11vs MD.GucciaLost 01
L#3 DoublesGloria Hale / Keeley McCormick vs Jennifer Moses / Angie Bostrom3-6, 1-6
2024-08-04vs TOC.BarcinasWon 10
W#3 DoublesMarina Barthalmus / Stephanie Lee vs Connie Kim / Kelly Felten7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Amy Hobbs
published 3.5
3.32
Marina Barthalmus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Kelli Harris
published
3.01
Traci Brooks
published
2.93
Keeley McCormick
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
2.75
Amber Bruner
published 3
2.68
Smita Shukla
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Sabina Brookhart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Smita Shukla + Marina Barthalmus4256% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Hobbs
55W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Marina Barthalmus
218W–213L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%91%8%
3.32
Kelli Harris
40W–37L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Traci Brooks
12W–19L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Keeley McCormick
47W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
Theresa Rosario-Jansen
9W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Amber Bruner
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Smita Shukla
194W–187L career · 4 lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.68
Sabina Brookhart
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.