Teams

Miller - RS Clay

2025 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 4.11 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-28vs Crooke - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Akiko Ichimasa vs Michelle Covell / Eric Stewart6-0, 6-0
2025-07-22vs Escambia/McCall/18&Over8.0XWon 10
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Akiko Ichimasa vs Jerry Mosley / Whitney Sumrall6-0, 6-1
2025-07-19vs Andresen - PCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Akiko Ichimasa vs Josh Sitton / Alexia Rycroft6-0, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Lubomir Kaderjak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Carel Demanss
published 4.5
4.17
Holly Rose
published 4.5
4.17
Lauren Haack
published
3.95
Bennett Gaston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.94
Beata Antal
published 4
3.89
Ive Marsach
published 4
3.83
3.66
3.59
Ryan Elliott
published
3.58
Akiko Ichimasa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.55
Nick Farkas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.18
Michael Ghiorso
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lubomir Kaderjak + Akiko Ichimasa36370% games+9.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lubomir Kaderjak
183W–34L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
4.36
4.5
Carel Demanss
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Holly Rose
3W–1L career · type D · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
4.17
Lauren Haack
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
4
Bennett Gaston
13W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Beata Antal
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Ive Marsach
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Christopher Brown
11W–18L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Elizabeth Elliott
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.66
Ryan Elliott
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
3.5
Akiko Ichimasa
79W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Nick Farkas
50W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Michael Ghiorso
9W–10L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.