Teams

Ju.Andrews18A

2024 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-13vs Ma.Cambo18AWon 40
W#1 DoublesParker Rumley / Melissa Burke vs Alina Dawson / Sam Fouser6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Paris / MA Allen vs Madeline Cambo / Shanie Kpanay6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Badham vs Kelsey Brandt6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSettle Monroe / Brooke Jenkins vs Kalli Unthank / Callan Fike6-2, 6-1
2024-05-12vs Je.Sagal Solomon18AWon 50
W#1 DoublesJulianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham vs Anna Kethey / Christy van Ness6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSettle Monroe vs Jennifer Kimball7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesParker Rumley / Melissa Burke vs Jennifer Sagal Solomon / Dana Earle6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Crystal Beard3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCaroline Wall / Brooke Jenkins vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-04-28vs Co.Haynes18ALost 03
L#1 DoublesMA Allen / Parker Rumley vs Merab Puleo / Michelle Gessner3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMeghan Paris / Caroline Wall vs Sarah Lukz / CAROLINE FLAMANT4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSettle Monroe / Lorah Henry vs Connie Haynes / Lauren Fye6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-04-22vs Kr.Levine18AWon 31
W#1 DoublesJulianne Andrews / Jennifer Badham vs Samantha Pickett / Courtney Kaprelian6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMA Allen / Parker Rumley vs Laura Stanziale / Jennifer Kaulback3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesAnna Goodmon vs Monica Gardner6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSettle Monroe / Caroline Wall vs Laurie Holderness / Melissa Proctor6-1, 6-4
2024-04-14vs Me.Gill18ASplit 22
W#1 DoublesJennifer Badham / Settle Monroe vs Kristin Esham / Jaime Gaskins6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesParker Rumley vs Abigail Douek3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMA Allen / Caroline Wall vs Sarah Warren / Lowry Liggon0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMeghan Paris / Melissa Burke vs Claudia Cadet / Jackie Morse6-1, 6-4
2024-04-07vs Br.Robinson18A3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesMeghan Paris / Melissa Burke vs Paige Boyles / Rebecca Glendy6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulianne Andrews / Settle Monroe vs Emily Rubin / Jennifer McFarling6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMargaret Eller / Anna Goodmon vs Brittany Robinson / Alexa Spain4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-03-17vs Su.Braga18AWon 40
W#1 SinglesParker Rumley vs Cassy Albertson6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBrooke Jenkins / Settle Monroe vs Tina Goertz / Sarah Soleim6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesMeghan Paris vs Kelly Conlin6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCaroline Wall / MA Allen vs Holly Stephens / Chrissy Hartsfield6-1, 6-1
2024-03-03vs La.Kane18AWon 40
W#1 DoublesParker Rumley / Brooke Jenkins vs Rachel Betzwieser / Julia Butler6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJennifer Badham vs Kasani Amore6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCaroline Wall / Meghan Paris vs Karen Wahle / Maria Riemann6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSettle Monroe vs Rose Trimpey-Warhaftig6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Jennifer Badham
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 3.5
3.26
Settle Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Julianne Andrews
published
3.17
Parker Rumley
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.08
Meghan Paris
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.05
Margaret Eller
published
3.04
MA Allen
published
2.98
Anna Goodmon
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.98
Caroline Wall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lorah Henry
published
Spruill Mayhew
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Wall + Meghan Paris6270% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Paris + Jennifer Badham2352% gamesnot enough data
Caroline Wall + Margaret Eller314 matchesnot enough data
Settle Monroe + Jennifer Badham314 matchesnot enough data
Parker Rumley + Meghan Paris123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Wall + Settle Monroe213 matchesnot enough data
Settle Monroe + Meghan Paris303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jennifer Badham
87W–15L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%15%85%
3.65
3.5
Settle Monroe
65W–33L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
Julianne Andrews
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Parker Rumley
26W–44L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Meghan Paris
85W–62L career · 7 lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
3.08
Margaret Eller
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%35%65%
3.05
MA Allen
6W–5L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.04
3
Anna Goodmon
76W–41L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Caroline Wall
96W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Lorah Henry
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Spruill Mayhew
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.