Teams

Yadkin/Georgitis/40 6.5

2025 Yadkin Valley Combo 40 & Over · Women 6.5 - Thursday Night

15 players · average NTRP 3.22 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-09vs Yadkin/Blackwell-De Young/40 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFelice Manget Harvey / Sarah Kaplan vs Alyssa Howards / Nancy Hart7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCathy Ralston / Susan Bjerke vs Nancy Denizard-Thompson / Laura Gregory5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDeana Georgitis / Dana Alligood vs Cristina Fernandes / Araya Puwanant6-4, 6-2
2025-10-02vs Yadkin/White-Girard/40 6.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesSusan Bjerke / Samantha Talbott vs Nora Ferrell / Christina Soriano6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCandace Bowman / Sarah Kaplan vs Lucie Temple / Dina Maguire6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCathy Ralston / Tammy LaValley vs Julie Long / Janine Hawley Girard6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-18vs Yadkin/Blackwell-De Young/40 6.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Bjerke / Debbie Lord vs Nancy Hart / Karen Lehman6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCandace Bowman / Dana Alligood vs Cristina Fernandes / Nancy Denizard-Thompson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Foster / Joanna Hamilton vs Araya Puwanant / Kimberle Collet6-2, 7-5
2025-09-11vs Yadkin/White-Girard/40 6.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesTammy LaValley / Amy Starnes vs JoAnn White / Julie Long4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCandace Bowman / Joanna Hamilton vs Janine Hawley Girard / Maile Kim6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDeana Georgitis / Susan Bjerke vs Sandra Simpkins / Lori Mueller6-1, 6-0
2025-08-28vs Yadkin/Blackwell-De Young/40 6.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesFelice Manget Harvey / Joanna Hamilton vs Meghan de Young / Ann Majors7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCandace Bowman / Sarah Kaplan vs Nancy Hart / Amy Braden3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDudley Commander Burkhalter / Deana Georgitis vs Jenny Orr / Alyssa Howards6-4, 7-5
2025-08-21vs Yadkin/White-Girard/40 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Bjerke / Deborah Foster vs Clarissa Tatum / Christina Soriano2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSamantha Talbott / Amy Starnes vs JoAnn White / Lori Mueller4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLiz Chavez / Tammy LaValley vs Janine Hawley Girard / Donna Johnson3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 - Thursday Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Dudley Commander Burkhalter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Sarah Kaplan
published
Candace Bowman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Susan Bjerke
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Felice Manget Harvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Deana Georgitis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.01
Liz Chavez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Samantha Talbott
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Amy Starnes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Dana Alligood
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.96
Joanna Hamilton
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Deborah Foster
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.68
Cathy Ralston
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Tammy LaValley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Debbie Lord
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deana Georgitis + Dana Alligood11171% games+17.8% vs expected
Tammy LaValley + Cathy Ralston033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dudley Commander Burkhalter
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
3.32
Sarah Kaplan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Candace Bowman
15W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Bjerke
9W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Felice Manget Harvey
7W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Deana Georgitis
44W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Liz Chavez
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
Samantha Talbott
34W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3.5
Amy Starnes
8W–26L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Dana Alligood
30W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Joanna Hamilton
19W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
3
Deborah Foster
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Cathy Ralston
25W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%91%1%
2.68
Tammy LaValley
20W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Debbie Lord
4W–17L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.