Teams

PH BLUE

2021 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-05-27vs CHCC NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Sowitch / Carolyn Schilling vs Adrine Writer / Wendy Croney4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMichelle Campbell vs Maureen Kechriotis6-2, 6-4
2021-04-24vs GCC REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSarah Brown / Sandy McGregor vs Heidi Wolfe / Keli Loehr4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Sowitch / Aree Bly vs Lisa Adams / Michelle Belitz7-5, 6-1
2021-04-14vs CACI GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy McGregor / Aree Bly vs Angela Rose / Somsi Stringer7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAndrea Sowitch vs Jessica Pohl7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Campbell / Carolyn Schilling vs Holly Kortum / Mary Candee1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-04-11vs CACI GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandy McGregor / Michelle Campbell vs Angela Rose / Somsi Stringer6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAree Bly vs Jessica Pohl6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSarah Brown / Carolyn Schilling vs Holly Kortum / Mary Candee3-6, 3-6
2021-03-27vs CHCC NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesAree Bly / Sandy McGregor vs Cynthia Mix / Marcy White6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Andrea Sowitch
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.77
Aree Bly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
Ericka Beck
published 4
3.73
Michelle Campbell
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Sandy McGregor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Carolyn Schilling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Schilling + Ericka Beck3257% games+7.9% vs expected
Aree Bly + Sandy McGregor312652% games+0.1% vs expected
Carolyn Schilling + Sandy McGregor1543% games−3.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrea Sowitch
64W–55L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Aree Bly
67W–58L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Ericka Beck
15W–14L career · type M · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michelle Campbell
64W–89L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Sandy McGregor
105W–164L career · 4 lines in 2021
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Carolyn Schilling
56W–85L career · type A · 3 lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.