Teams

Kiwi Kids

2022 Adult 55 and Over League · 8.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WEST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-18vs Lava GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesShauna Miller / Shellee Starks vs Wendy Heurtelou / Sheri Kinoshita7-6, 6-0
2022-06-18vs Na HuiLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Yates / Shellee Starks vs Karen Unger / Teresa Paulson4-6, 4-6
2022-06-11vs Na HuiLost 01
L#1 DoublesShellee Starks / Shauna Miller vs Joni Izumi-Nakamoto / Kari Kimura2-6, 3-6
2022-06-11Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShellee Starks / Julia Yates vs Esther Hughes / Alice Shingle4-6, 1-6
2022-06-04vs Lava GirlsWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarey Katase / Julia Yates vs Michelle Smith / Kim Wayman3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesFletcher Olson / Sandy Caldwell vs Susan Webber / Alice Shingle7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShauna Miller / Shellee Starks vs Dawna Martin / Keely Rochon6-0, 6-1
2022-06-04vs Na HuiLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarey Katase / Julia Yates vs Sue Brown / Toni White2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFletcher Olson / Sandy Caldwell vs Joni Izumi-Nakamoto / Shirley Ono7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShauna Miller / Shellee Starks vs Teresa Paulson / Kari Kimura6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Shauna Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Fletcher Olson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Lovette Llantos
published
Julia Yates
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kirsten White
published
Shellee Starks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fletcher Olson + Kirsten White6057% games+4.6% vs expected
Shellee Starks + Shauna Miller6170% gamesnot enough data
Lovette Llantos + Fletcher Olson2351% gamesnot enough data
Lovette Llantos + Shauna Miller213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Shauna Miller
66W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
Fletcher Olson
58W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
Lovette Llantos
23W–22L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
3.51
Julia Yates
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kirsten White
20W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Shellee Starks
21W–7L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.