Teams

LCParrish//Jetton 18s 2.5 Thurs am

2023 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.94 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-11vs LKGalloway/Jetton 2.5Split 11
W#1 SinglesCindy Plua vs Jamie Chapman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Rowland / Molly Stokas vs Kelly Spiggle / Allie Spencer1-6, 4-6
2023-05-04vs LSHayes/RR W 2.5 Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 SinglesCindy Plua vs Jenny Brewton6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-20vs LKGalloway/Jetton 2.5Won 10
W#1 SinglesCindy Plua vs Julia Cameron6-1, 6-1
2023-03-30vs LSHayes/RR W 2.5 Thurs AMLost 01
L#1 SinglesCheryl Parrish vs Jenny Brewton0-6, 1-6
2023-03-28Won 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Parrish / Molly Stokas vs Lindsey Davis / Danielle Beckett6-3, 6-3
2023-03-16vs LKGalloway/Jetton 2.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMolly Stokas / Christine Rowland vs Allison Felgenhauer / Jamie Chapman2-6, 2-6
2023-03-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesAllison Cambruzzi / Cheryl Parrish vs Tess Daniels / Luanne Luby6-3, 6-0
2023-03-09vs LSHayes/RR W 2.5 Thurs AMWon 10
W#1 SinglesCindy Plua vs Veronica LeGrand-Kirad6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Sallie Cune
published 3
2.86
Cindy Plua
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.84
Molly Stokas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.84
Sandra Self
published
2.80
2.80
Randi McClanahan
published 3
2.73
Quincy Eassa
published 3
2.70
ShariAnne McDermott
published
2.52
2.13
Cheryl Parrish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Randi McClanahan + Sallie Cune2346% gamesnot enough data
Molly Stokas + Quincy Eassa213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sallie Cune
77W–82L career · no lines in 2023
<1%73%26%
2.91
3
Cindy Plua
54W–50L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%84%15%
2.86
3
Molly Stokas
38W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
2.84
Sandra Self
12W–20L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Allison Cambruzzi
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Randi McClanahan
40W–48L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
2.80
3
Quincy Eassa
23W–17L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
ShariAnne McDermott
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Christine Rowland
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
43%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Cheryl Parrish
13W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.