Teams

KConners (Jeff Adams)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Wed PM

5 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-11vs TFailla/JDichak (Weddington)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKevin Conners / Parker Manning vs Frank Grindle / Rishi Kapur6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBradley Carley / Antonio Farrington vs Francis Dantino / Tano Failla3-6, 5-7
2022-04-27vs MWallace (Queens)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesCJ ONeill / Daniel Gonzalez vs Mike Wallace / John Tynan4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAntonio Farrington / Jack Horton vs Will Foster / Daniel Holden2-6, 4-6
2022-04-20vs KFox (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 DoublesCJ ONeill / Daniel Gonzalez vs Kevin Fox / Dan Horner5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesParker Manning vs Ganesh Pallem3-6, 1-6
2022-04-06vs DDeMaine (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesParker Manning / CJ ONeill vs Jim Yablonski / Joe Sexton6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAntonio Farrington / Gerardo Estrada vs Devon DeMaine / Alex Giardina0-6, 1-6
2022-04-04Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAntonio Farrington / Parker Manning vs Dan Li / Yuan Zhao1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCJ ONeill vs Ziyou Wu3-6, 2-6
2022-03-30vs JButurff (Life Time)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAntonio Farrington / Parker Manning vs Biju Nair / David Tyson3-6, 0-6
2022-03-09vs ALawler/BGibson (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKevin Conners / CJ ONeill vs Todd Creange / Josh Miller7-5, 6-4
2022-03-02vs TSandy (CITC)Split 11
W#2 DoublesCJ ONeill / Daniel Gonzalez vs Hunter Cannon / Beau Bagley6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAntonio Farrington / Bradley Carley vs Matthew Turner / Jeff Winterich2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
CJ ONeill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.25
Parker Manning
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.11
Antonio Farrington
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.06
Gerardo Estrada
published 3.5
2.90
Rohit Soman
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
CJ ONeill
67W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Parker Manning
43W–36L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Antonio Farrington
19W–35L career · 15 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Gerardo Estrada
25W–38L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Rohit Soman
41W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.