Teams

Richards/Memphis

2023 Tri-Level 18 & Over - Memphis · 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Emily Gallops
published
3.71
Bianca Clayton
published 4
3.69
Caitlin Bond
published 4
3.43
Dina Vann
published
3.40
Latasha Echols
published
3.20
Grace Bann
published
3.20
Sophia Garrison
published
3.20
Taylor Wetta
published
3.06
Mandy Alford
published
2.90
Sandra Richards
published
2.90
Agatha Asemota
published 3
2.83
Susan Northen-Lacy
published
Angela Burkes
published 3
2.70
Leslie Tate
published
2.68
Tarshian Moon
published
Jacqueline Sharp
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Gallops
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
34%65%<1%
4.06
4
Bianca Clayton
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Caitlin Bond
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
Dina Vann
3W–10L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Latasha Echols
31W–31L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Grace Bann
31W–37L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Sophia Garrison
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Taylor Wetta
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Mandy Alford
36W–31L career · no lines in 2023
0%<1%>99%
3.06
Sandra Richards
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.90
3
Agatha Asemota
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
2.90
Susan Northen-Lacy
21W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Angela Burkes
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Leslie Tate
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
2.70
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
2.68
Jacqueline Sharp
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.