Teams

V - Wood Ranch Dukes

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over - WE · Ventura - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-25vs V - Spanish Hills PiratesLost 01
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Jeff Sutterman vs Jonathan Gerlach / Val Hill0-6, 4-6
2023-11-11vs V - Wood Ranch HitmenLost 01
L#2 DoublesEdmond Avedisian / Garen Amirganian vs James Coe / Warren Bachtel2-6, 1-6
2023-10-14vs V - Mission Oaks Firecrackers IIWon 10
W#3 DoublesChang Yi / Edmond Avedisian vs Steven Nimoy / Vikas Dogra5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-30vs V - Sunset Point 4.0 DubsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Sutterman / Edmond Avedisian vs Cory Rodrigues / Eric Buhr4-6, 5-7
2023-09-17vs V - Libbey Chief PeaksWon 10
W#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Edmond Avedisian vs Danny Everett / Greg Doss6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Cho
published 4
3.62
Peter Heinbecker
published
3.59
Edmond Avedisian
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.55
Kevin Humfreville
published
3.50
Garen Amirganian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Matthew Guerrero
published
3.30
Chang Yi
published 3.5
3.25
Rod Shimamoto
published
3.16
Mel Johnson
published
2.95
Jay Idea
published
Jeff Sutterman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edmond Avedisian + Garen Amirganian134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Cho
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Heinbecker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
4
Edmond Avedisian
104W–115L career · 4 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Kevin Humfreville
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Garen Amirganian
217W–148L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Matthew Guerrero
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Chang Yi
13W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Mel Johnson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
Jay Idea
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95
Jeff Sutterman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.