Teams

Break Point Tennis

2023 18&Over Women · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-19vs WTLOVLost 01
L#2 DoublesSophia Karabatsos Coy / Leah Aizen vs Sharon Crego / Deirdre Burns2-6, 3-6
2023-07-12vs WTLOVLost 01
L#2 DoublesBianca Verrilli / Leah Aizen vs Sharon Crego / Melissa Gibson6-0, 6-7, 0-1
2023-06-28vs Southern: Taconic: Wise AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaurie Hedlund / Karla Wainwright vs Susan Leary / Rika Tanous2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesErinn McGurn / Jacquelyn Arsenuk vs Abbie Grossman / Marta Russell1-6, 2-6
2023-06-21vs Cross Court: ServivorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Aizen / Sophia Karabatsos Coy vs Alexandra Choi / Karen Rossi2-6, 0-6
2023-05-17vs Southern: Taconic: Wise AcesLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaurie Hedlund / Karla Wainwright vs Andria McKenna / Erica Cronin1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesVictoria Harding vs Lucy Burnes1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesErinn McGurn / Jacquelyn Arsenuk vs Kimberly Lee / Yong Ciardi2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMinna Hughes / Leah Aizen vs Abbie Grossman / Marta Russell3-6, 0-6
2023-05-10vs Cross Court: ServivorsLost 01
L#3 DoublesLeah Aizen / Elizabeth Reichheld vs Andrea Maya Feigelson / Margaret Coughlan3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Shawn Holzmann
published
3.27
Bianca Verrilli
usually #1 Singles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.26
Laurie Hedlund
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Elisabeth Balachova
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 36% · published
2.74
Jelena Skoro
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Charlotte Haims
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Elizabeth Reichheld
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Leah Aizen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.61
Minna Hughes
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published
Angela Pham
published
Erinn McGurn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Harley Rosenblum
published
Jacquelyn Arsenuk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karla Wainwright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sophia Karabatsos Coy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Victoria Harding
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlotte Haims + Jelena Skoro4356% games+12.3% vs expected
Leah Aizen + Charlotte Haims3541% games+2.6% vs expected
Jelena Skoro + Sophia Karabatsos Coy2337% games−8.4% vs expected
Laurie Hedlund + Karla Wainwright31137% games−10.9% vs expected
Minna Hughes + Jelena Skoro4157% gamesnot enough data
Leah Aizen + Minna Hughes044 matchesnot enough data
Leah Aizen + Elisabeth Balachova044 matchesnot enough data
Minna Hughes + Elisabeth Balachova224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn Holzmann
60W–22L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
4.24
3.5
Bianca Verrilli
65W–39L career · 8 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Laurie Hedlund
11W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Elisabeth Balachova
41W–32L career · 11 lines in 2023
1%90%8%
2.80
Jelena Skoro
29W–32L career · 9 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Charlotte Haims
29W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Elizabeth Reichheld
10W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Leah Aizen
117W–277L career · 7 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
Minna Hughes
53W–45L career · 7 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
Angela Pham
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Erinn McGurn
17W–23L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Harley Rosenblum
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jacquelyn Arsenuk
17W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karla Wainwright
17W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sophia Karabatsos Coy
21W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Victoria Harding
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.