Teams

OC Great Park - Beckloff 9:30

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

21 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-03-28vs OC LLW Dana Hills TC - Dara 10:30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKaeko Jenni vs Dara Luangpraseut1-6, 1-6
2023-02-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKaeko Jenni vs Nicole Cornell2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lisa Grigoriou
published
3.37
Shiva Shokouhi
published
3.35
Jodie Hoffman
published
3.31
Dana Orsini
published 3.5
3.27
Kaeko Jenni
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Maria Valera
published
Beth Hoss
published 3.5
3.22
Natalie Finn
published 3.5
3.22
Madona Shaheen
published
3.16
Khanh Vu
published
3.13
Renee Beckloff
published
3.12
Dawn Shapiro
published 3.5
3.00
Tiffney Beckloff
published
2.89
Audree McClintick
published 3.5
2.83
Dawn Currie
published 3
2.83
Joanne Cordero
published
Jodi Farrell
published
Karen Glenn
published
Kendall Culwell
published
Kimberly Gangnes
published
Masha Empringham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Hoss + Jodie Hoffman4151% games+5.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Grigoriou
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
Shiva Shokouhi
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Jodie Hoffman
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Dana Orsini
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Kaeko Jenni
93W–89L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Maria Valera
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Beth Hoss
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Natalie Finn
16W–32L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Madona Shaheen
18W–12L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Khanh Vu
17W–32L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Renee Beckloff
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dawn Shapiro
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
Tiffney Beckloff
5W–15L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Audree McClintick
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.89
3
Dawn Currie
10W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Joanne Cordero
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
2.83
Jodi Farrell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Glenn
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kendall Culwell
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kimberly Gangnes
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Masha Empringham
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.