Teams

ABroemel (Queens)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.19 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-04-30vs EAnderson (Queens)Lost 12
W#2 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Annie Hart vs Emma SEGAL / Jami Stone6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKim Gissy vs Sylvia Holper0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAllison Broemel / Mallory Burns vs Caroline Skjoedt / CC Shellabarger1-6, 2-6
2025-04-23vs TThailer/PMullins (OPRC)Lost 23
L#1 DoublesMargaret Campbell / Abbey Ellis vs Stacey Brown / Trudy Thailer6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKim Gissy vs Anne Schmitt4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Broemel / Lauren Smith vs Kathleen Clark / Lori Quattlebaum6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesMallory Burns vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesKait Beck / Stacy Melton vs Anita Matai / Sandra Troni4-6, 4-6
2025-04-16vs JCarlsen (River Hills Country Club)Split 22
L#1 DoublesShannon Grant / Abbey Ellis vs Gretchen Hildner / Jackie Graber6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKait Beck / Kathryn Pride vs Sophie Karsch / Lisa Wright2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesKim Gissy vs Jessica Bradford6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAllison Broemel / Stacy Melton vs Leah Youngblood / Sandy Towell6-2, 6-1
2025-04-09vs SJPragasam/ERoach (Jeff Adams)Split 11
W#2 DoublesMargaret Campbell / Abbey Ellis vs Jennifer Little / Kate Loor6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAllison Broemel / Lauren Smith vs Kelly Sylvester / Vicki King3-6, 1-6
2025-04-02vs KCronin/Ferguson (Piper Glen)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesMargaret Campbell / Van ONeill vs Stephanie Rock / Allyson McDonough2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKait Beck / Kathryn Pride vs Lindsey Ferguson / Alicia Fink5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMallory Burns vs Trisha Smith1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Broemel / Shannon Grant vs Joanne Joliet / Kathy Harborne6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-26vs RJoplin/MKelling (Queens)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesSydney Gaston / Abbey Ellis vs Brooke Leonnig / Katie van Valkinburgh2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKim Gissy vs Karissa Chaplinsky2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesMallory Burns vs Becky Shopf3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKatie Perry / Kait Beck vs Jill Carnahan / Bridget Happney6-2, 6-2
2025-03-19vs LPinzon/SCochran (Life Time)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Sydney Gaston vs Leidys Pinzon / Kristina Cancian6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKim Gissy / Stacy Melton vs Alexis Cochran / Scarlett Cochran1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAllison Broemel / Kait Beck vs Alyson Vaughan / Joyce Mu6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-12vs WHead (Southampton)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAbbey Ellis / Lauren Smith vs Ariel Burgoon / Holli High4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStacy Melton / Kait Beck vs Kim Rivera / Esther Craig1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesKim Gissy vs Cheri Johnson4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMargaret Campbell / Mallory Burns vs Whitney Head / Rebecca O'Toole0-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-05vs BBaker (Park Road)Lost 12
L#1 SinglesKim Gissy vs Katherine Koppel-Dobbs5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Grant / Van ONeill vs Lauren Spanos / Allison Purmort3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesKait Beck / Allison Broemel vs Spencer Stoakley / Kathy Kopec7-6, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Sydney Gaston
published
3.24
Abbey Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published 3.5
3.07
Stacy Melton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Kim Gissy
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.94
Allison Broemel
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.94
Kait Beck
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.94
Kathryn Pride
published
2.93
Mallory Burns
usually #2 Singles 42%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.92
Van ONeill
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.81
Annie Hart
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Broemel + Kait Beck91446% games+2.3% vs expected
Allison Broemel + Stacy Melton4747% games−8.9% vs expected
Kait Beck + Stacy Melton134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sydney Gaston
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Abbey Ellis
49W–43L career · 12 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Stacy Melton
14W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Kim Gissy
98W–80L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Allison Broemel
65W–92L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Kait Beck
45W–68L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
Kathryn Pride
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Mallory Burns
45W–67L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3.5
Van ONeill
18W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.92
3
Annie Hart
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.