Teams

TSR : Synergy

2025 40&Over Women · 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule17 played
2025-07-21vs WTLOVWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Hettinger / Rika Tanous vs Martha Little / Andrea Piehler6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSarah Herlihy vs Bianca Verrilli7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGina Imperiale / Karina Heffron vs Cassidy Nasello / Melissa Mayes6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNancy Yi / Diane Ackley vs Carolynn Frankel / Judy Godfrey6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-07vs WTLOVWon 31
L#1 DoublesSusan Cooper / Rika Tanous vs Martha Little / Susan Choung6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Herlihy vs Bianca Verrilli6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGina Imperiale / Susan Leary vs Christy Steiner / Cassidy Nasello6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMaria Hickey / Nancy Yi vs Elizabeth Hammond / Maggie Tallman3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-06vs Smash SistersLost 13
W#1 DoublesRika Tanous / Susan Cooper vs Katrina Duffy / Karen Ventosa6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesAimee Heinly vs Elizabeth McCollum1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Leary / Christine Young vs Yvonne Walker / Hairong Xing4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRobin Davis / Gina Imperiale vs Karen Rossi / Susan Blankensop3-6, 2-6
2025-06-30vs Smash SistersSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKristin Hettinger / Rika Tanous vs Karen Rossi / Karen Ventosa6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesSarah Herlihy vs Katrina Duffy6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Leary / Aimee Heinly vs Yvonne Walker / Margaret Connolly4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMelanie Redl / Joann Parker vs Lesley Kleinschmidt / Tildy La Farge2-6, 4-6
2025-06-16vs WTLOVWon 21
L#1 DoublesGina Imperiale / Aimee Heinly vs Martha Little / Andrea Piehler7-6, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Herlihy vs Bianca Verrilli6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Hickey / Christine Young vs Jinyoung Hoyt / Melissa Mayes6-3, 6-2
2025-06-11vs Genesis Saw Mill Club: Alley CatsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Liye Zhang6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-06Lost 01
L#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Anne Kelly3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-06-05vs Smash SistersWon 40
W#1 DoublesKristin Hettinger / Rika Tanous vs Katrina Duffy / Karen Rossi7-5, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSarah Herlihy vs Elizabeth McCollum6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusan Leary / Gina Imperiale vs Rebecca Dickson / Susan Blankensop6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaria Hickey / Christine Young vs Margaret Coughlan / Nicole Drury6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Dorothy Plechaty3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Smash SistersLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Herlihy / Gina Imperiale vs Hairong Xing / Karen Ventosa6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Katrina Duffy1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCaroline Salas-Humara / Kristin Hettinger vs Susan Blankensop / Yvonne Walker6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSusan Leary / Christine Young vs Margaret Connolly / Karen Rossi6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Joanna Segal6-4, 6-4
2025-04-28vs WTLOVWon 40
W#1 DoublesSusan Leary / Gina Imperiale vs Martha Little / Andrea Piehler6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesSarah Herlihy vs Susan Choung7-5, 4-3
W#2 DoublesRika Tanous / Caroline Salas-Humara - (DQ) vs Elizabeth Hammond / Christy Steiner6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiane Ackley / Melanie Redl vs Carolynn Frankel / Dawn Tomassi6-3, 6-3
2025-03-30vs Blue/BanksLost 01
L#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Lisa Feldman3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2025-03-09vs NRRC: Suburban LegendsWon 10
W#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Carrie Foley6-3, 6-3
2025-02-09vs Rowe/CheeWon 10
W#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Miriam Brunnwasser6-2, 6-1
2025-01-13vs Brash/ShengWon 10
W#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Christina Mott6-1, 7-6
2025-01-08vs MaselbasWon 10
W#1 SinglesKarina Heffron vs Laurel Boylen6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TSR : Synergy08211126254

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Kristin Hettinger
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.81
Caroline Salas-Humara
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.51
Gina Imperiale
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.48
Sarah Herlihy
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #1 Doubles 9% · published
3.35
Susan Leary
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.33
Rika Tanous
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Karina Heffron
usually #1 Singles 91%, also #2 Doubles 9% · published
3.20
Aimee Heinly
usually #1 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.18
Christine Young
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.17
Nancy Yi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Maria Hickey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Melanie Redl
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.95
Susan Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Diane Ackley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joann Parker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Hettinger + Caroline Salas-Humara19665% games+15.7% vs expected
Gina Imperiale + Susan Leary9263% games+11.5% vs expected
Maria Hickey + Karina Heffron5261% games+11.1% vs expected
Susan Leary + Aimee Heinly4358% games+9.3% vs expected
Rika Tanous + Sarah Herlihy101055% games+8.9% vs expected
Susan Cooper + Gina Imperiale12558% games+7.5% vs expected
Christine Young + Aimee Heinly6455% games+6.9% vs expected
Susan Cooper + Susan Leary3451% games+6.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Hettinger
29W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.85
4
Caroline Salas-Humara
23W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Gina Imperiale
82W–43L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Sarah Herlihy
88W–63L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Susan Leary
116W–88L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Rika Tanous
128W–103L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
Karina Heffron
65W–28L career · 11 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Aimee Heinly
56W–54L career · 7 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Christine Young
66W–77L career · 7 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Nancy Yi
33W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Maria Hickey
136W–76L career · 3 lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
Melanie Redl
71W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Susan Cooper
85W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.95
3
Diane Ackley
36W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Joann Parker
19W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Davis
15W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.